Received the following report from a new faculty member who endured SFT's speech last week during orientation: SFT came across as something less than an intellectual; he empahsized repeatedly the need for economic development and grant writing; he used the phrase "world class university" nearly a dozen times (despite what the US News & World Report was about to say regarding this); and he demonstrated no knowledge about what it is that faculty members actually do: teaching and research (except for "economic development"). This new faculty member was wondering how they will be evaluated in coming years when the expectations of the university president diverge so sharply form those of the department in which they are housed?
Nice to see that SFT hasn't changed even a little (as the Natchez Democrat article last week also showed). Finally, USM splurged to send all the new faculty to Barnhills for lunch (for those who don't know - and who doesn't know? - Barnhills is a cheap buffet of all the fried and high-fat food you can eat) a great introduction to all that is high class at USM. Ugh!
I didn't hear about Barnhills--this, apparently, paled for the new faculty members I spoke to in comparison with being asked to pray before the meal (last I heard, this was still a public university) and with hearing male colleagues referred to with title ("Dr. X") and female colleagues given first and last name only. Have others heard the same? This is tacky, rinky-dink, embarrassing, and potentially very dangerous, not to mention just plain wrong.
quote: Originally posted by: Ellen Weinauer "with hearing male colleagues referred to with title ("Dr. X") and female colleagues given first and last name only. Have others heard the same? This is tacky, rinky-dink, embarrassing, and potentially very dangerous, not to mention just plain wrong. No quarter. Ellen Weinauer"
Becky Woodrick is still here through December. I too heard that the females were referred to by first and last names and the males were referred to by title. It is totally unreal.
quote: Originally posted by: Swan Song "Becky Woodrick is still here through December. I too heard that the females were referred to by first and last names and the males were referred to by title. It is totally unreal."
Are you saying that a complaint needs to be filed? Sounds like a plan to me.
Sounds like a discrepancy to me. Men and women both work for and earn similar degrees with similar titles, but the men are called by the title they earned (such as "Dr.") but women are called by other titles ("Ms.", "Miss", " Mrs.") rather than the title they too earned ("Dr."). The connotations are obvious.
quote: Originally posted by: Swan Song "Sounds like a discrepancy to me. Men and women both work for and earn similar degrees with similar titles, but the men are called by the title they earned (such as "Dr.") but women are called by other titles ("Ms.", "Miss", " Mrs.") rather than the title they too earned ("Dr."). The connotations are obvious. "
Many years ago my Organic Chemistry Professor at the University of Kansas advised the class that she'd worked much harder to achieve her "Mrs." status than her Ph.D., which she'd earned at a little known public institution called Cal Tech. She said she much preferred to be addressed as Mrs. Allen, and might not even answer to Dr. or Professor. Her comment drew a big laugh from the class, but we later learned she was dead serious. And, I should add that she was one of the best real teachers I've ever been exposed to.
quote: Originally posted by: Austin Eagle " Many years ago my Organic Chemistry Professor at the University of Kansas advised the class that she'd worked much harder to achieve her "Mrs." status than her Ph.D., which she'd earned at a little known public institution called Cal Tech. She said she much preferred to be addressed as Mrs. Allen, and might not even answer to Dr. or Professor.
and then there's always, "hey dude, where's my prof?"
Seriously, choice is one thing and what apparently happened at the orientation is another. If someone wants to be titled Mrs., or Professor, or Master, or whatever, that's that person's perogative. Some women still prefer "Mrs. Thaddeus Whately," or whatever the husband's name is. That's their choice and I have no quarrel with that, although I never wanted to be titled in that manner. But where folks are equally qualified for a particular title (and one that is, after all, the POINT of the event), and where preference is not known, they should of course be addressed in equivalent terms.
Doggone it, Anne, you are right. It's about consistency. It's not about flaunting your prejudices in front of people and thinking that you are exempt from public censure. Or that public reaction is irrelevant.
I heard that the error may have been made by one or more of the deans. It was reported that the dean of CoST asked the new faculty to introduce themselves, so he didn't call out their names. I don't know which deans made the blunders.