question about Glamser-Sringer affair - USM Forum -- Message Board

Date: Jun 26, 2006

RE: question about Glamser-Sringer affair

Date: Jun 26, 2006

Can he comment on the details of the case? Is Carter back to his old ways again?

Date: Jun 26, 2006

I think that Carter refused to give proper credit to things that the plaintiff was doing that were clearly delineated in the CBA Handbook. Perhaps Cossack can provide more insight.

Date: Jun 26, 2006

LVN wrote:

Could I BESEECH you gentlemen to let this thread return to its original topic, and start a new thread if you want to continue a COB discussion?

Here's the fallacy in your request, LVN: There was NEVER a real topic here. The point from the original poster was to set up a critcism of George Carter. From what is now years of watching these exchanges, I am surprised more people don't see it developing and recognize it for what it is. Posters, even board savvy ones like you, fall for the technique again and again and again. It is really time that they get called out by name for the havoc they wreak.

Date: Jun 26, 2006

Bilge Pump wrote:

Here's the fallacy in your request, LVN: There was NEVER a real topic here. The point from the original poster was to set up a critcism of George Carter. From what is now years of watching these exchanges, I am surprised more people don't see it developing and recognize it for what it is. Posters, even board savvy ones like you, fall for the technique again and again and again. It is really time that they get called out by name for the havoc they wreak.

Wasn't it Frank Glamser who first mentioned Carter by name on this thread? So now Glamser's in cahoots with the "scourge" of the COB? Puh-lease. Or are you saying that Glamser is stupid and has been manipulated? Again, puh-lease.

Date: Jun 26, 2006

collegiality R us wrote:

... Wasn't it Frank Glamser who first mentioned Carter by name on this thread? ...

No, it was Retiree3 in the third post.

Date: Jun 26, 2006

I started another thread. Please leave me out of this.

Date: Jun 26, 2006

The packet.

I was the secretary for AAUP-USM when Frank Glamser was president. Frank Glamser did the honorable thing, and took the packet to the president. He hand-delivered it and I ought to know, since I walked over with him. Considering the allegations, it was the most appropriate thing to do. Unfortunately, the appropriate response never happened.

I think that about sums it up.

Amy Young

Date: Jun 26, 2006

Is retiree #3 one of the CoB scourge? Why do you all hire scourge?

Date: Jun 26, 2006

I was the secretary for AAUP-USM when Frank Glamser was president. Frank Glamser did the honorable thing, and took the packet to the president. He hand-delivered it and I ought to know, since I walked over with him. Considering the allegations, it was the most appropriate thing to do. Unfortunately, the appropriate response never happened.

I think this pretty well sums it up. It was a case of an honorable person dealing with a President without honor, and who was lacking much in the way of judgement and ethics.

Date: Jun 26, 2006

You are correct that I have not and cannot discuss the settlement you refer to, but I can set the record straight about my resignation.

I will take you at your word.