Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: NCAA financial reports data base
Far Away Alum

Date:
NCAA financial reports data base
Permalink Closed


There is a very interesting data base available at www.indystar.com--the Indianapolis newspaper. You can access it by going to their sports section. The original article was posted on March 30 I believe. Through the freedom of information act, the paper got the NCAA financial data from most schools. It has all revenue sources and expenses from all sports. For example, USM took in $1.3 million in football ticket sales last year. The football program took in almost $5 million of a total sports income of slightly over $18 million. Of course, that is small potatoes compared to the UT's and UCS's of the world, but it is very, very interesting. Check it out.

__________________
Worth the look

Date:
Permalink Closed

Revenue to Expense comparison was extremely interesting.

__________________
manova

Date:
Permalink Closed

Worth the look wrote:


Revenue to Expense comparison was extremely interesting.


We are $1.6 million in the black.  That does not seem interesting to me, especially considering they are trying to save money for expansion.  Maybe that means the university can stop giving $1.8 million to athletics.


What is interesting to me is that student fees makes up almost 30% of the budget ($5.2 million).  Ticket sales are only $1.8 million.  I think the students are getting the short end of the stick.  They are told that free tickets are such a privilege (not every school gets these), but 20 yard line seats, behind the goal in basketball...with the proportion of money given, they should get 50 yard line and chair back seats.  I know this would never happen, but I wonder how many students know that their fees are paying this much of the athletic budget (more than even the rich alumni, $4 million).



__________________
slive

Date:
Permalink Closed

manova wrote:


Worth the look wrote: Revenue to Expense comparison was extremely interesting. We are $1.6 million in the black.  That does not seem interesting to me, especially considering they are trying to save money for expansion.  Maybe that means the university can stop giving $1.8 million to athletics. What is interesting to me is that student fees makes up almost 30% of the budget ($5.2 million).  Ticket sales are only $1.8 million.  I think the students are getting the short end of the stick.  They are told that free tickets are such a privilege (not every school gets these), but 20 yard line seats, behind the goal in basketball...with the proportion of money given, they should get 50 yard line and chair back seats.  I know this would never happen, but I wonder how many students know that their fees are paying this much of the athletic budget (more than even the rich alumni, $4 million).


manova, you hit the nail on the head on both counts.  Compare USM to SEC schools.  You will see a fraction of USM's level of student fees at those places, which are generally much larger in terms of enrollment also, and you will find no direct institutional support.


Excellent post! 



__________________
TransLucent

Date:
Permalink Closed

Can I assume (after reading this article and following the links) that this means that USM students and Shelby Thames are keeping the football program alive?

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard