E-mail from USM Psychology Prof - USM Forum -- Message Board

Date: Mar 21, 2006

E-mail from USM Psychology Prof

Date: Mar 21, 2006

thumbed wrote:

Could someone find and post the lengthy e-mail that was written by a USM psychology prof just after the President locked Glamser and Stringer out? The e-mail was a lengthy diatribe that was extremely favorable to the Thames-Hanbury side (against Glamser/Stringer). In fact, it was so helpful to them (Thames-Hanbury) that it was being forwarded to the wider USM community and to local business people by pro-Thames faculty in the economic department.

Please make that the economic development department. I was just told there is a big difference by my colleague next door. Oooops. She also tells me that it was officially the economic development & worker training group at that time (the time of the e-mail).

Date: Mar 21, 2006

thumbed wrote:

thumbed wrote: Could someone find and post the lengthy e-mail that was written by a USM psychology prof just after the President locked Glamser and Stringer out? The e-mail was a lengthy diatribe that was extremely favorable to the Thames-Hanbury side (against Glamser/Stringer). In fact, it was so helpful to them (Thames-Hanbury) that it was being forwarded to the wider USM community and to local business people by pro-Thames faculty in the economic department. Please make that the economic development department. I was just told there is a big difference by my colleague next door. Oooops. She also tells me that it was officially the economic development & worker training group at that time (the time of the e-mail).

I think you mean Professor Stretch. I remember the e-mail too.

Date: Mar 21, 2006

I remember this well. It was pretty bad. That e-mail, which many may have forgotten, along with the chair's letter to the HA and others' pro-admin comments here indicate that psychology was on the wrong side for much of this "war."

Date: Mar 21, 2006

I think some of you are forgetting that many in psychology were in support of Glamser/Stringer. While Stan K. did write letters to the HA in favor of Thames, that hardly represents the entire department.

Date: Mar 21, 2006

Andy wrote:

I think some of you are forgetting that many in psychology were in support of Glamser/Stringer. While Stan K. did write letters to the HA in favor of Thames, that hardly represents the entire department.

Anyone found the e-mail yet?

Date: Mar 21, 2006

USM Psychology Department: 32 faculty (approx)

Tier I Grads=9

Tier II Grads=13

Tier III Grads=6

Tier IV Grads=4

(Done using US News 2006, per origin of PhD)