low case wrote: didn"t accounting just put Joe Morgan's sister on tenure track?
Yessiree. Currently 2 members of the Morgan clan work in the CoB. Jackson would be the third. Then there's the 2 Jacksons that used to work in the CoB. Plus the Morgans and Jacksons who work elsewhere on campus. It's a family affair. You don't want control of the plantation slipping away from the big house.
Elephant Memories wrote: Those of us who remember the strangulation of deceased poultry will never forget what the author called his Director. The insane bigoted vendetta continues.
In my experience, anything Dr. DePree has had to say, he has always put his name to. Unlike most of us, he has never felt the need to hide behind a made up name. If he ever has anything to say on this board, I strongly suspect you will see his name. If you want to call him a bigot, why don't you have the courage to do it to his face. Obviously, you think as well as you read. "Choking Dead Chickens" was fiction.
Elephant Memories wrote: It's okay for you to spread lies but for no one else to point out your motivations? The judge was right. You should have been put away, in one place or the other.
Obviously your memory isn't that good. Dr. DePree was cleared of all charges.
So I guess you are the one spreading lies. I know, you think I'm Dr. D. You are wrong again. By the way, what are your motivations for spreading lies?
OK Webmaster, I understand and respect your decision but please keep in mind that you are protecting the guilty as well as the innocent. There are a handful of business posters who have not only made the college a horrible place for their colleagues but they have taken over this message board as well.
Any webmaster or moderator has a duty to protect the board, not to protect guilty people or innocent people. I imagine that some posts get taken down solely because they quote the "bad" one, not because they're "bad" in and of themselves.
When it was suggested that this board go to registration, there was strong feeling against that. Stricter moderation may be the price of remaining "open."
USM Accounting/Manag Info Sys Department: 14 faculty (approx) Tier I Grads=2 Tier II Grads=5 Tier III Grads=5 Tier IV Grads=2 (Done using US News 2006, per origin of PhD)
Any webmaster or moderator has a duty to protect the board, not to protect guilty people or innocent people. I imagine that some posts get taken down solely because they quote the "bad" one, not because they're "bad" in and of themselves. When it was suggested that this board go to registration, there was strong feeling against that. Stricter moderation may be the price of remaining "open."
I understand and was not criticizing the webmaster but rather acknowledging my part in requiring today's censure. Just frustrating because I am so sick of their rampant crap. They get to name call, spread unmitigated lies and blatant rumors but the wagons immediately get circled if there is any response in kind. You were right a long time ago LVN when you said posters would all meet at the coming out party and realize that no one liked each other (paraphrasing). I should do what friends have been telling me to do for two years now - stay off the d... board.
Duly Chastised wrote: I understand and was not criticizing the webmaster but rather acknowledging my part in requiring today's censure. Just frustrating because I am so sick of their rampant crap. They get to name call, spread unmitigated lies and blatant rumors but the wagons immediately get circled if there is any response in kind. You were right a long time ago LVN when you said posters would all meet at the coming out party and realize that no one liked each other (paraphrasing). I should do what friends have been telling me to do for two years now - stay off the d... board.
This problem appears to have begun with an attack on a business professor, for no apparent reason and for issues unrelated to the thread. With each cycle, the writings became more outrageous. If what you have to say is something you won't say to someone's face, perhaps you shouldn't say it.
As for name calling, unmitigated lies, etc., it appears to me that plenty of these come from both sides of the COB issue. The wagons quickly circle on both sides. This is not a situation where it appears that either side is pure of heart or motive.
If SFT has no respect for COB, it is not just because of the Dean -- it is also because of the faculty -- on both sides -- who engage in this unscholarly, impolite and possibly improper conduct. Every email that comes from COB has a tagline that says "The College of Business: Our core mission reflects taking PRIDE in all we do - Professionalism, Respect, Integrity, Discipline, Excellence." However, I would suggest that some (not all) of the faculty take great delight in violating each element of the mission. Perhaps if you cannot demonstrate some modicum of professionalism, respect, integrity and discipline, you should stay off the board.
Fine, IB. The premise of this thread is false as are most started by this crew. Every post that adds to it violates the principles you raise yet it is allowed to stand and the posters who build on its false premise are protected. I'm done, cannibalize yourselves.
This problem appears to have begun with an attack on a business professor, for no apparent reason and for issues unrelated to the thread. With each cycle, the writings became more outrageous. If what you have to say is something you won't say to someone's face, perhaps you shouldn't say it. As for name calling, unmitigated lies, etc., it appears to me that plenty of these come from both sides of the COB issue. The wagons quickly circle on both sides. This is not a situation where it appears that either side is pure of heart or motive. If SFT has no respect for COB, it is not just because of the Dean -- it is also because of the faculty -- on both sides -- who engage in this unscholarly, impolite and possibly improper conduct. Every email that comes from COB has a tagline that says "The College of Business: Our core mission reflects taking PRIDE in all we do - Professionalism, Respect, Integrity, Discipline, Excellence." However, I would suggest that some (not all) of the faculty take great delight in violating each element of the mission. Perhaps if you cannot demonstrate some modicum of professionalism, respect, integrity and discipline, you should stay off the board.
Not every one. One CoB faculty has this tagline:
"As the Philistine moved closer to attack him, David ran quickly toward the battle line to meet him. Reaching into his bag and taking out a stone, he slung it and . . ."
Fine, IB. The premise of this thread is false as are most started by this crew. Every post that adds to it violates the principles you raise yet it is allowed to stand and the posters who build on its false premise are protected. I'm done, cannibalize yourselves.
One small problem. I'm not in the College of Business. However, from someone who reads the board regularly, there appears to be a real problem. Both the pro-and-anti-Doty forces seem to be intent on destroying what remains of their college.
One small problem. I'm not in the College of Business. However, from someone who reads the board regularly, there appears to be a real problem. Both the pro-and-anti-Doty forces seem to be intent on destroying what remains of their college.
I dare say, the problems in COB are not small but are rather large. The simplistic analysis of pro-and-anti-Doty forces fails to capture the number of divisions in COB. Some who dislike the anti-Doty faction do not like Doty either. As for destroying what remains of the college, your analysis appears to have some validity.
Some genius wrote... Whispers in the CoB say that a new chair of Accounting and MIS has been chosen. Apparently his campus visit preceded his vita's arrival at USM. The Morgans strike again.
Some other genius wrote... 3. Jackson named Chair of Accounting. Jackson related to Morgan (of Professorship fame. Jackson also related to Anderson, who is also related to Morgan.
Yet another genius wrote... truth4usm gave me a real hard time about all this Morgan nepotism a couple of weeks ago. Here's another example of the family ties on USM's campus. Joe Morgan gets a promotion and his cousin gets an unadvertised administrative position within a month?
OK. I'm glad to be able to resolve this matter. I know the Morgans reasonably well and I know a couple of the Jacksons. Jackson and Morgan are not related. I'll shout it once for the geniuses. JACKSON AND MORGAN ARE NOT RELATED.
I assume all people of honor involved in this thread will be calling Mr. Morgan tomorrow to apologize. Anyone? Anyone? Will there even be any anonymous apologies? It doesn't take much to get an idiot riled up, but it takes an act of God to get him to apologize.
Please feel free to mouth off at will. I'll check in again in a few weeks to enjoy your next lemming-like thread of idiocy.
Haiku Eagle, taking a break from bad poetry wrote:
Some genius wrote... Whispers in the CoB say that a new chair of Accounting and MIS has been chosen. Apparently his campus visit preceded his vita's arrival at USM. The Morgans strike again. Some other genius wrote... 3. Jackson named Chair of Accounting. Jackson related to Morgan (of Professorship fame. Jackson also related to Anderson, who is also related to Morgan. Yet another genius wrote... truth4usm gave me a real hard time about all this Morgan nepotism a couple of weeks ago. Here's another example of the family ties on USM's campus. Joe Morgan gets a promotion and his cousin gets an unadvertised administrative position within a month? OK. I'm glad to be able to resolve this matter. I know the Morgans reasonably well and I know a couple of the Jacksons. Jackson and Morgan are not related. I'll shout it once for the geniuses. JACKSON AND MORGAN ARE NOT RELATED. I assume all people of honor involved in this thread will be calling Mr. Morgan tomorrow to apologize. Anyone? Anyone? Will there even be any anonymous apologies? It doesn't take much to get an idiot riled up, but it takes an act of God to get him to apologize. Please feel free to mouth off at will. I'll check in again in a few weeks to enjoy your next lemming-like thread of idiocy.
Assuming you are accurate, the matrix doesn't change much: