This website is like a puzzle that is being put together, piece by piece.  It will eventually paint a picture of one of the most corrupt universities you'll find.  Keep the pieces coming.

I have a technical question about this week's installment.  If USM does not archive e-mails, is it possible that for particular individuals, there is another way to monitor their e-mails?  For instance, could copies of their e-mails automatically be sent to security or SFT at the time they are originally sent?  That way they could say they don't have an archive, but at the same time read any e-mail sent to or from a person of interest.

If you read it carefully, the website already contains some damning evidence against USM -- administrators who flaunt a lack of accountability, everyone (even Foundation employees) answers to Shelby, etc. It's time to pull back the curtain that hides the secret of the USM Foundation. If what I've been told is true, this will be the next big scandal.

kick