Mitch wrote: The indicator for this is that neither the chair, nor faculty, have a reasonable explanation in hand for how SFT and Jay made this decision. The only information I have received, as stated above, is that SFT is targeting psychology. I was told this many months ago, and what we are seeing is consistent with this predication. Hand in hand with this goes the allocation of big bucks on the Friends and Family plan. Does this qualify as the next stupid thing?
Dearies, what you have here is called a "work-around." ST has been told not to fire anybody else. Therefore, instead of firing Mitch et. al. the way he tried to fire Frank and Gary, he's just going to use the nuclear option. Make the whole class stay in after school, so to speak. Make your life as difficult as possible. Someone told me not long ago that ST never forgets and never forgives and always seeks retaliation, even years later. (Of course, Mother Nature and Father Time are going to catch up with him before he achieves all he hopes to, a point in your favor.)
In the meantime, never leave your computer unattended, and never leave it in your office. But you knew that.
mitch--i'm in a doctoral degree granting unit where we direct dissertations as overloads. standard load is 3 per semester, with no 400/500 games played. research expectations are consistent with those of a doctoral unit here. sadly, until the first staffing analysis was done about 3 years ago, we had not been able to hire in years. our junior faculty member was a full professor, having gone through the ranks while here (try 12 years). we had retirements but no lines. i think what is happening to psych is criminal at best. but, i've been here long enough to see this happen in other colleges for years.
As another poster noted, if you are at a 3/3 in a doctoral granting unit, and you are expected to publish at the same level as similar departments at peer institutions (which may be a better goal than the doctoral expectations within your college if you are to get better), you are probably way out of kilter and at a big disadvantage in attempting to compete for external bucks, increasing enrollment, and attracting better students. But I know this has been going on in many colleges for years (COST has generally been the only college to have teaching loads comparable to peer institutions). SFT has not been in a rush to put in place a strategic and rational work load policy (heck, the drug and alcohol policy we put together a long time ago went down a black hole somewhere). You may hit the 300 SCH/FT ratio index this way, but it is a penny wise and pound foolish way to operate. Doesn't make it smart or right (funding formulas are tied to SCHs, but this needs to be accomplished in a smart way that also allows the institution to get better).
To put your plight in context, one of my grad students just took a job at Appalachian State with has just masters students, and his teaching load will essentially be 2/3. Millsaps is 3/3-zip masters or doc programs in my area.
Perhaps another reason to speak up. You will be at the AAUP meeting, I hope?
mitch, joe, et al.--it's getting late so i'll respond now and maybe in the morning.
mitch--about GAs being in a staffing formula. if you have GAs teaching courses that could be taught by faculty, then why do you need faculty? imagine english having tenure track faculty teaching freshman composition.
sit down mitch! (i'm kidding!) i know that you don't have GAs do that. then why not?
i'm tired will see responses in the morning and see if there's something that i can respond to.
I am actually weighing in tonight. I have a 3/2 load with pretty nice perks, so they still exist at an assoc. prof. level. What's your incentive to buck this system?? I admire you, but - like all people stung by the SFT bumblebee - I wonder how you have the resolve to stand up. What you've done is admirable, and I'm in your corner of the ballfield applauding.
joe--your response came through while i was responding to mitch's response. i wish all doctoral programs had graduate assistant support to help get grants. mine doesn't. they teach. they have to teach. but this makes me wish for a college of social and behavioral sciences (hey mitch--been discussed for 20 years--want to make it happen?! my department would go in a microsecond from COAL).
Do it, SCM! Seriously, it would make more sense comparing Granny Smith to Washington apples when trying to come up with the nuts and bolts of T&P, resource allocation, and so on. I hear it is a nightmare trying to come up with a fair way to deal with both the Arts and Social Science folks in your college. It would also allow us to make better use of interdisciplinary opportunities -- When do we move into our new building, Dean SCM?
geez--this has become a thread where a slow typist gets blitzed by multiple responses. to answer one question you asked--no i will not be at the AAUP meeting. i could bitch about the AAUP and the apparent failure of the national organization to give a "rats hind quarters" about USM, but i won't.
geez--this has become a thread where a slow typist gets blitzed by multiple responses. to answer one question you asked--no i will not be at the AAUP meeting. i could bitch about the AAUP and the apparent failure of the national organization to give a "rats hind quarters" about USM, but i won't.
mitch--i'm sleepy but your comment on a social and behavioral sciences college raised my blood pressure. there are lots that would support it. with the next administration it's something that needs to be pursued.
LOL wrote: Someone told me not long ago that ST never forgets and never forgives and always seeks retaliation, even years later.
You better believe it.
Sometimes I wonder what life is like if you are obsessed with revenge, with always going for the jugular, for having 10,000 people you consider enemies to each one you trust (notice I didn't say is a friend.)
No psychologist wrote: Sometimes I wonder what life is like if you are obsessed with revenge, with always going for the jugular, for having 10,000 people you consider enemies to each one you trust (notice I didn't say is a friend.)
Well dearie, I would say it's a pretty miserable life, in spite of the tiny little power in the tiny little kingdom. But frankly, and according to his own professed belief system, it's not this life Dr. Thames needs to be worrying about. And at that Trial, there will be a far, far different Judge.
I find it difficult to believe that we in the Psychology Department are deserving of having ALL our searches suspended.
You don't seem to know for certain that your college dean went to bat for your department when all of your positions were jerked. What action did your department chair take in this matter other than report it to the faculty?
He has a meeting scheduled with the provost early this week.....
Isn't he the chair who wrote that strangely supportive letter to the editor at the time when things were beginning to deteriorate? Let's hope he's changed his tune.
Isn't he the chair who wrote that strangely supportive letter to the editor at the time when things were beginning to deteriorate? Let's hope he's changed his tune.