Hadn't heard. Too bad for the College of Business. It seems USM is the only place stupid enough to have wanted him for a dean. Now that we have him we don't want him either. What a disaster!
I don't know who might be applying where, for what, or why, but I am reasonably confident that USM's reputation is not going to help any of us get an academic position elsewhere.
In my own job search, I found leaving USM to be a plus. Prospective employers were aware that USM was a quality place in the process of falling to pieces. They were hoping to pick up some of the worthwhile leftovers from the carcass. Second, leaving USM negated the usually awkward question of "why are you leaving?" Since all parties already "knew" the answer to that one, it made the interviews less strained. Sort of like an academic version of Enron.
Now any administrator above a chair is a different matter. I hope they have the luck they individually deserve.
depends wrote: In my own job search, I found leaving USM to be a plus. Prospective employers were aware that USM was a quality place in the process of falling to pieces. They were hoping to pick up some of the worthwhile leftovers from the carcass. Second, leaving USM negated the usually awkward question of "why are you leaving?" Since all parties already "knew" the answer to that one, it made the interviews less strained. Sort of like an academic version of Enron. Now any administrator above a chair is a different matter. I hope they have the luck they individually deserve.
Anecdotal evidence would lead me to believe this is true--especially for productive faculty who are known in their respective areas.
Anecdotal evidence would lead me to believe this is true--especially for productive faculty who are known in their respective areas.
Nationally visible and productive faculty can almost always find a good place to land. I was referring to the great unwashed. Institutional reputation can often be deciding factor all other things equal.