Angie who? - USM Forum -- Message Board

Date: Feb 9, 2006

RE: Angie who?

Date: Feb 9, 2006

Farmer wrote:

Machiaveli:
Do your own work build what you thought you could do. Reap and who wil sow?

Boys, do you know the meaning of the words "reap" and "sow"? It sounds like you've got them backwards. Sow is to plant, reap is to harvest. Weren't you paying attention in Sunday School?

Date: Feb 9, 2006

you mean sow as in the animal sow....which still doesn't make sense.

Date: Feb 10, 2006

Yes Little old lady I do know the difference just wanted to put a real good twist on the topic. Sorry, I will calll the Tenured UK Vice-President for spelling lessons. Have a good day.

Date: Feb 17, 2006

Who is this person and what does she do? I am a new student and I am new to the board. All I have heard is that she caused complete chaos to this place due to her qaulifications. Then she was moved quietly by the President out of sight and got a raise.

Date: Feb 17, 2006

Newbie wrote:

Who is this person and what does she do? I am a new student and I am new to the board.

Hi new student. Welcome aboard! To answer your question, do a google search on Glamser + Stringer and the Chronicle of Higher Education article listed there.

Date: Feb 17, 2006

Thanks for the information Firedome Eight. The article speaks volumes about her. How could this President be so dumb is what I asked a fellow student and I was told he was on her board when she worked in Jackson. Based on what I have been told she hurt alot of people. I feel sorry for the professors as it must have been tough on them and their families. How does a person like her get away with so much. The whole controversy based on my perception from the article and what I have heard from students who suffered the fiasco she caused alot of problems and hurt not only the professors but had no regard for the students and how it affected them. I certainly hope the next President does not hire that quality or lack of quality of person.

Date: Feb 19, 2006

Newbie, you had us fooled there for a while, but you blew it. Same old same old.

Date: Feb 19, 2006

Little old lady wrote:

Newbie, you had us fooled there for a while, but you blew it.

Little old lady, how did Newbie blow it?

Date: Feb 19, 2006

Newbie wrote:

please do not make any comments about me unless you can expalin and prove them. Thank you so kindly.

To board regulars, she doesn't have to explain them.

Date: Feb 19, 2006

No need to worry Newbie. Little old lady is one of A. Dvorak's cronies trying to undermine anything that is said about her. Heck, if you were out holding yourself out as a leader like she is with limited qaulifications you would want a group to do the same. Again Newbie, do not worry keep on track and research and ask all the questions you want to.

Date: Feb 19, 2006

I apologize now if I'm wrong, but I think "newbie" is the (or one of the) same people who keep bumping up the Angie threads. I won't share my theory on who I think it is, however. Whatever this person's agenda is, I and other posters would appreciate some content instead of remarks about hair and appearance.
Believe me, I'm no fan of Dr. D, it just gets tiring having this same junk to wade through all the time. If your "research" yields anything we need to know, fine. But I wonder where you get your information.
Like I said, if your legit, then I'm sorry.

Date: Feb 19, 2006

Gastropod wrote:

No need to worry Newbie. Little old lady is one of A. Dvorak's cronies trying to undermine anything that is said about her. .

HAHAHAHAHA!!! Dearie, you don't actually read the board, do you?

Date: Feb 19, 2006

ha ha: I am as regular as I can be given my study schedule. I appear in and out looking mostly but found this topic to be of discussion not only her but on campus and out and about in town. Yes Little old lady I am "legit." But again, as I hear things and have the opportunity to post then I will.

Thank you

Date: Feb 19, 2006

ha ha -- I do not see you as a regular on this board but of course I pick the threads I go to. I do not mind the threads dealing with Dvorak becuase it is interesting and should be to the entire USM community and community as to how she affects us negatively.

Date: Feb 19, 2006

Speaking opinion is one thing. Using the board to vent personal spleen is something else, and damages the impact of the board.

Dr. Dvorak was involved in events which were very, very serious. People's lives and careers were at stake, and in some cases, lives and careers were wrecked. This is important and worthy of discussion. Her friends and allies would be welcome to post if they had something to say besides "faculty are evil, lazy golf-playing wastrels. And liberals." Her enemies would be welcome to post if they could talk about something besides her hair and her personal life. For my part, I don't care if she stays out all night and comes to work in her bathrobe. I don't care if she dyes her hair purple. For that matter, I dye my hair and stay up all night (not out, just up.) Who gives a flyin' flip?

What I DO care about is the destruction of USM, the waste of taxpayer's money, and whatever part she has played in those events.

Focus on the personal aspects, ugly snide remarks and name calling take attention away from the real and very serious issues we should be concerned with. In fact, they create sympathy, not scorn, and are therefore counterproductive and a huge waste of our time and bandwidth.

Date: Feb 19, 2006

LVN wrote:

Speaking opinion is one thing. Using the board to vent personal spleen is something else, and damages the impact of the board. Dr. Dvorak was involved in events which were very, very serious. People's lives and careers were at stake, and in some cases, lives and careers were wrecked. This is important and worthy of discussion. Her friends and allies would be welcome to post if they had something to say besides "faculty are evil, lazy golf-playing wastrels. And liberals." Her enemies would be welcome to post if they could talk about something besides her hair and her personal life. For my part, I don't care if she stays out all night and comes to work in her bathrobe. I don't care if she dyes her hair purple. For that matter, I dye my hair and stay up all night (not out, just up.) Who gives a flyin' flip? What I DO care about is the destruction of USM, the waste of taxpayer's money, and whatever part she has played in those events. Focus on the personal aspects, ugly snide remarks and name calling take attention away from the real and very serious issues we should be concerned with. In fact, they create sympathy, not scorn, and are therefore counterproductive and a huge waste of our time and bandwidth.

Well said, LVN. There are so many threads on just the first page of this board about Doty and Dovrak full of nothing fo substance. Some suggested having a debate, but you need substance for a debate. I can't believe faculty are that involved on this board. From the quality of the post and all the strange names (usually used only once), I beginning to think our board is being flooded by bored undergraduate and/or high school students.

Date: Feb 19, 2006

While I agree that one can overboard commenting on other folk's hair, clothes and waistlines, some folks flaunt their shortcomings to a degree that it is really hard to hold back. So, I say whack her again on dress and looks, but stay within the limits. Do not say anything about he momma

Date: Feb 19, 2006

LeftASAP wrote:

Well said, LVN. There are so many threads on just the first page of this board about Doty and Dovrak full of nothing fo substance. Some suggested having a debate, but you need substance for a debate. I can't believe faculty are that involved on this board. From the quality of the post and all the strange names (usually used only once), I beginning to think our board is being flooded by bored undergraduate and/or high school students.

You know, Left ASAP, you are starting to sound like a troll. You come on these threads, disrupt the discussion, and leave, like a hit-and-run poster. I recall that you used to post in an overtly anti-Thames manner, yet you now run to the aid of Dvorak and Doty? I am convinced that proximity to a situation improves one's knowledge of that situation. Apparently you either do not want to believe or cannot recall all of the points brought against these two individuals over the months. Maybe you just cannot synthesize the many posts into a consistent stream of fact upon which to base an opinion. However, I will encourage you to rethink your position before your continued troll-like activity leads to you being branded as such. USM still has many problems, most of which stem from individuals who Shelby hired. These infectious, cancerous human infestations MUST BE removed for USM to rise again. Every time you make an attempt to squelch discussion, I ask myself, "What does 'Left ASAP' have to gain from leaving secondary players in the USM fiasco in place?" Until I get proof positive of malice, I will just assume that you're too ignorant to know what you're doing.

Date: Feb 19, 2006

Style vs. Substance wrote:

LeftASAP wrote: Well said, LVN. There are so many threads on just the first page of this board about Doty and Dovrak full of nothing fo substance. Some suggested having a debate, but you need substance for a debate. I can't believe faculty are that involved on this board. From the quality of the post and all the strange names (usually used only once), I beginning to think our board is being flooded by bored undergraduate and/or high school students. You know, Left ASAP, you are starting to sound like a troll. You come on these threads, disrupt the discussion, and leave, like a hit-and-run poster. I recall that you used to post in an overtly anti-Thames manner, yet you now run to the aid of Dvorak and Doty? I am convinced that proximity to a situation improves one's knowledge of that situation. Apparently you either do not want to believe or cannot recall all of the points brought against these two individuals over the months. Maybe you just cannot synthesize the many posts into a consistent stream of fact upon which to base an opinion. However, I will encourage you to rethink your position before your continued troll-like activity leads to you being branded as such. USM still has many problems, most of which stem from individuals who Shelby hired. These infectious, cancerous human infestations MUST BE removed for USM to rise again. Every time you make an attempt to squelch discussion, I ask myself, "What does 'Left ASAP' have to gain from leaving secondary players in the USM fiasco in place?" Until I get proof positive of malice, I will just assume that you're too ignorant to know what you're doing.

You must have a reading problem S.vs.S. I only complained about the quality of the post and the lack of substance. You think that means, "...yet you now run to the aid of Dvorak and Doty?" I haven't tried to "squelch discussion" but asked, along with LVN, for some substance. This post of yours also lacks substance because all of the issues you make concerning me are in your imagination. Why don't you review the post on this board and list the "substantive" issues about Doty and Dvorak that are new.

P.S. Please don't post a picture of either person. I find that hard to debate.

Date: Feb 19, 2006

LVN- I agree and disagree with you about comments made regarding A. Dvorak. As it has been mentioned earlier she is one of the very reasons this board was created because she wrecked peoples lives without any remorse. Her personal life so what your right she cannot help the way she looks or dresses. Tastelessness is a character flaw one she cannot correct regardless but what she can help is how she destroys people. She still has a major impact on USM. In fact everytime she goes to Jackson to the capitol for money she is competing with USM. She would rather take the money and say look what I did for ADP not the community but ADP. Therefore, this hits both interests you have USM and tax payers dollars. Competition with USM for money and the money the politicians give out is clearly tax payers dollars.

I myself after all this welcome any comments about A.Dvorak after the havoc she has created in this town and the way she talks about people behind their backs and then is so freindly to them in person. She is a ruthless fake with lack of quality and taste. Again, she still has interaction with USM and has a major impact on USM in day to day dealings. Remember as one thread states the Trent Lott Center was her project and she screwed it up and left it hanging in the air only to blame others like Bobby Chain, the Mayor and others.

She has never once stood up and taken the blame for any wrong she has done, yet she represents our local economy. You have to be kidding me. LVN you know it is important so lets just go with the flow. Let people vent and speak their peace. We would not have this board but for her wrongs and Shelby's wrongs so it is important to some. Maybe you are right some comments should not be made. But some people still have not forgot her Glamser-Stringer days and the plots she created with her cronies. She got the golden parachute and they got the golden boot!

Date: Feb 21, 2006

It seems that Mark Dvorak has once again GONE OFF THE DEEP END and is having one of his alcohol induced melt downs. It’s really sad that IMPORTANT ISSUES are taking a back seat to a DRUNK IDIOTS private bashing of A.Dvorak.

So with all do respect Mr. Dvorak go away!! This site was designed for legitimate people to discuss REAL ISSUES not hair color or appearance!!

Date: Feb 21, 2006

Chaucer, what makes you think that's Mark Dvorak?

Date: Feb 21, 2006

Good Evening,

Well I can't imagine anyone else would lower themselves to petty personal attacks. I would hope you agree that attacks on A.Dvorak's hair and appearance are of no interest to legitimate readers!

Cheers,

Date: Feb 21, 2006

From reading the posts, I would assume it's a student. Mr. Dvorak has a law degree so one assumes he's a better writer.

I do wonder, however, why you pulled up a two-day old thread to start this nonsense.

Date: Feb 22, 2006

LVN:

I agree with you on the point you made earlier. However, I must say this and I speak only for myself. 1. You are right my typing skills on the board stink but it is no reflection of my work. 2. I do not understand why everytime a negative comment is made here about A. Dvorak that the poster is blamed as bieng a troll or Mark Dvorak. I have only met Mark Dvorak once and that was when he was employed here at USM and he helped me with an issue related to my job here. However, I have seen him on a number of occassions at the Purple Parrot with the famous group, "The Kentucky Cabal," but that was some time ago.

This same issue came up last week at lunch where there was a discussion about A. Dvorak and a negative comment was made and a person in the conversation said "you must have heard that from her ex-husband," the person making the comment said "mo, I do not know him I heard it from one of her employees." I cannot comment about anyone's legal or writing abilities, because I do not know them. I cannot cooment on anyone's attendance at social events, because I was not there and I cannnot comment on anyone's personal life without knowing them. The only comments I can make about any Dvorak is A. Dvorak and they are basd on what I see and hear around town, what I hear on campus. I do not like her and never will because of what she did at USM and the lives she ruined.

Sorry LVN to take up so much time but I felt that Chaucer has some problems with identity and blame, especially with negative comments about A. Dvorak. Chaucer, not every person on this board, in town or on campus who has a negative comment to make about A. Dvorak is Mark Dvorak, nor do they get their information from him. Besides, I do not want to be a man I am just fine being the woman that I am. Take it or leave it Chaucer.

Thx for hearing me out.

Date: Feb 22, 2006

Sorry for the typing errors and grammar in my last post, I am in a hurry.