Without opposition, let me start this conversation by stating some very intersting things that have transpired in the last two weeks.  But first, let me say this, although I was accused of being a part of the Kentucky cabal I am not, I was hired only to do a job and protected those in need.  Russ Willis is one of the finest persons I have ever met and I will continue to be not only his friend but his advocate should the need arise as it did in the past.

Last week I was accused of being a participant on this board by my ex-wife who said she "pinged me," which is not possible given my setup.  She accused me of using assumed names such as "local" and "scoop."  This is an asbsurd accusation.  I was also accused by J. Hnabury of the same.  The truth of the matter is I have not been in MS since May of 2005.  The last post I placed on this board was in March the same time my former partner placed posts and yes, they were under assumed names in efforts to save A. Dvorak.

Last week I received an e-mail in response to an e-mail that I have been posting on this site.  My first inclination is to prove that.  To settle both A. Dvorak and J. Hanbury's concerns there is no equivocation or antics.  I could careless about either party.

I my phone coversation with A. Dvorak, she stated she would sue me and that she had taped telephone conversations of assumed calls I have made to a certain CPA firm.  J. Hanbury has also assused me of making telephone calls to the same firm.  I would like to hear these taped conversations.  My telephone records do not show these calls.  Moreover, I have been accused of calling a certain CPS'a wife.  This is quite absurd to me.  What would a CPA's wife have to do with all this.  I sure want to hear these taped conversation.

I was also accused by J. Hanbury who says "his sources tell him" that I have used certain ADP board members as moles.  I will not mention the names in this e-mail because I do not think it is fair to bring innocent people into a battle with no grounds.  Furhtermore, I was accused of harassing ADP employees.  Not true.  My insurance "cobra" is administered through ADP I have no choice but to contact them.  I did send two e-mails to A. Dvorak through her assistant and I was not pleased when they were sent because I could not get any answers which I am entitled to.

If the above alegations are true, please produce the evidence and I will respond.  As A. Dovorak's attorney told me I might not want to answer questions he has.  I will answer any question.  Our divorce is fianl and I am not the one concerned about what I have done in the past.  The question is who drove who to what.

The biggest mistake I made was 16 years ago having a realationship with my English "Instructor" and then months later she filed for divorce from her husband and children.  I waited 17 years to late, especially after she divocred me in 1990 and then remarried me the same year.  My concern is not her filing for raises prior to her defendig her dissertation to be promoted.  My problem is not her hiring at the Mississippi Technology Alliance,  My problem is not her? Hiring at ADP.

I could careless and do not want anything to do with her or J. Hanbury.  If A. Dvorak's attorney wants to file suit against me that is fine but any lawyer would know that you cannot file suit against a person who tells the truth.  The law is about the truth.

My credentials have not been a matter of question for this forum.  All I ask is to be left alone and not bothered by the above mentioned certain person.  I have already been discredited since I left Hattiesburg and I will not tolerate it anymore.

All the above information I have provided can be and will be if necessary provided by hard documentation, i.e. paperwork which speaks louder than "cheek and tongue."  The only information A. Dvorak has against me is word of mouth either by her or her friends.  Of course she has access to my insurance inforamtion but use of that constitutes a HIPAA violation.  Should the need for a law suit to be filed, file it it, it will be frivolous.  Again, you cannot sue a person for telling the truth.

Again, my credentials are not and have not been a question of controversy and any question or response to the contrary is merely an "ill" responsive vendetta as it has been in the past.

Cordailly