Why do we have money for super raises for administrators but no money for improvement of instruction grants? The following email was recently sent to individuals who applied for grants.
Amy Young
The Office of the Provost has received your application for the Summer Grants for the Improvement of Instruction award. While we are pleased to know that you have submitted your proposal for consideration, we want you to know that there may be a possibility that the funds will not be available.
We will let you know the status of these grants as quickly as we can.
Janis Williams for Cynthia Easterling Moore, Ph.D.
It's sad that these small grants can really do so much to improve education. They really give faculty to gear up with new skills or new technology, or to purchase equipment or teaching aids. In anthropology, we are in dire need of fossil casts and equipment for teaching various labs in archaeology and physical anthropology.
And, unfortunately for the current situation, sometimes "The Golden Eagles" get the turkey (or is that turkeys?) in the "big golden egg." Come to think of it, the whole "MIDAS" concept just begs for someone to remember the last half of that particular fable.
already gone wrote: the whole "MIDAS" concept just begs for someone to remember the last half of that particular fable. Please remind us of how that story ended. Just a sentence or two will jog my memory.
From Wikipedia:
Dionysus offered Midas his choice of whatever reward he wanted. Midas asked that whatever he might touch should be changed into gold . . . As soon as he got home, he ordered the servants to set a feast on the table. Then he found that his bread, meat and wine turned to gold and became inedible. He found that when he touched his daughter, she turned into a statue as well. This made him realize the bad choice he'd made."
Later on, he also gets donkey's ears, but that's another story.
Seems that Wikipedia is correct. But be careful, as it is written by whoever wants to contribute, whether or not they are experts in the topic. My professional society's list serve once had a big converstaion about Wikis--and found them more interesting as a cultural phenomena than a source of reliable information. For example, the entry on one of my subject-specialties seems to be taken from a bad undergradate textbook.
Seems that Wikipedia is correct. But be careful, as it is written by whoever wants to contribute, whether or not they are experts in the topic. My professional society's list serve once had a big converstaion about Wikis--and found them more interesting as a cultural phenomena than a source of reliable information. For example, the entry on one of my subject-specialties seems to be taken from a bad undergradate textbook.
Doubtless you're correct in many cases. It would seem, in fact, that the Wikipedia entry is a paraphrase of Bulfinch, who is hardly under copyright by now. See at http://www.bulfinch.org/fables/bull6.html.