My Barnes & Noble bookstore had 9 copies of the 2006 Edition of the USNews ratings on their shelves late this afternoon. I now own one of them. The color of the cover is yellow.
I can confirm that USM remains in the 4th tier. There are 18 schools in the 4th tier that are rated lower than USM. USM is tied with two 4th tier schools for the 19th from the bottom spot.
Ole Miss and Mississippi State remain in the 3rd tier.
That's as far as I've read thusfar. Does any one think we might possibly see a wholesale resignation of the IHL? When a pig flies.
I can confirm that USM remains in the 4th tier. There are 18 schools in the 4th tier that are rated lower than USM. USM is tied with two 4th tier schools for the 19th from the bottom spot. Ole Miss and Mississippi State remain in the 3rd tier. That's as far as I've read thusfar. Does any one think we might possibly see a wholesale resignation of the IHL? When a pig flies.
We are higher than I thought we would be.
The IHL has succeeded in once and for all separating USM for the other two. They will be celebrating tonight. This is a major signal to prospective students, USM is second rate in the great state of MS. Shall we revise the USM "To The Top" slogan?
USM Sympathizer wrote: $9.95 plus tax USD wrote: Bad news: USM's "peer assessment" score in the 2006 Edition of USNews dropped from 2.2 to 2.1 since last year. Can anyone discuss the statistical significance of this change? Is it major or minor? Wish Robert Campbell were still with us to discuss this.
RC still reads the message board and is probably aware of the drop, but he wouldn't necessarily be the best person to assess statistical significance. Any of the statistician wizards within our own CoB could knock out that chore with ease.
Don't they know about our WORLD CLASS POLYMER SCIENCE PROGRAM! Look under programs in materials science. Our program should appear in the top three.
Good buddy, that would be in their graduate program edition that came out some time ago. I didn't see any of our graduate programs rated there, but all disciplines or sub- disciplines were not listed. Some of the ones that have been touted the most at USM were surprisingly absent.
$9.95 plus tax USD wrote: USNews 2006 peer evaluation ratings of the 13 colleges in Mississipi in their respective categories (5.0 = Highest) 3.3 Mississippi University for Women 3.0 Belhaven College, Mississippi College (tie) 2.9 Millsaps College 2.7 University of Mississippi 2.5 Delta State University 2.4. Mississippi State, Mississippi Valley State , Alcorn State, Blue Mountain College (tie) 2.3 William Carey College 2.1 University of Southern Mississippi 1.8 Jackson State University
This saddens me beyond words. I'm glad my Dad, Mississippi Southern College '44, isn't privy to this information. It would break his heart.
Insomniac wrote: Good buddy, that would be in their graduate program edition that came out some time ago. I didn't see any of our graduate programs rated there, but all disciplines or sub- disciplines were not listed. Some of the ones that have been touted the most at USM were surprisingly absent.
Dear (Fellow) Insomniac,
I just looked at the USN&WR website and it appears they do have the following category in the 2006 edition:
Undergraduate engineering specialties: Materials (At schools whose highest degree is a doctorate)
I do believe that USM offers a BS in polymer sciences and high performance materials, or some such thing. Of course USN&WR listed only the top few schools online, so I guess I must wait to see a copy of the new issue to see where we fit in.
However, your point that the USM polymer science program failed to make the list in the last graduate program edition is what is really of importance here.
USNews 2006 peer evaluation ratings of the 13 colleges in Mississipi in their respective categories (5.0 = Highest) 3.3 Mississippi University for Women 3.0 Belhaven College, Mississippi College (tie) 2.9 Millsaps College 2.7 University of Mississippi 2.5 Delta State University 2.4. Mississippi State, Mississippi Valley State , Alcorn State, Blue Mountain College (tie) 2.3 William Carey College 2.1 University of Southern Mississippi 1.8 Jackson State University
Austin Eagle and others viewing these numbers, be sure to remember that USNews initially put the 1,400 schools into various "mission categories" (some are national universities, others are liberal arts colleges, etc.). You cannot compre the ranks of different schools if the schools are in different mission categories. The colleges in each category are ranked against their peers. They are not ranked against colleges in the other categories. It is not possible to compare Mississippi State's 2.4 score with the 2.4 scores of Alcorn or Mississippi Valey; or the 3.0 of Belhaven with the 2.7 of Ole Miss; or the 2.7 of Ole Miss with the 3.3 of Mississippi University for Women. I used this format only as a convenient way of presenting the peer assessment scores themselves. It would have probably been best if I had listed the 13 schools alphabetically so that viewers would not tend to interpret the scores on a comparative basis. The peer assessment scores can be compared only if the schools are in the same mission category.
I found the presentation easy to interpret because I know the schools' mission catgegories The "big three" doctoral universities are Ole Miss, MS State, and USM. They are in the same mission category. Their peer evaluation scores are 2.7, 2.4, and 2.1 respectively. Those scores can be directly compared. There's no ambiguity there.
I found the presentation easy to interpret because I know the schools' mission catgegories The "big three" doctoral universities are Ole Miss, MS State, and USM. They are in the same mission category. Their peer evaluation scores are 2.7, 2.4, and 2.1 respectively. Those scores can be directly compared. There's no ambiguity there.
Chanel #5 wrote: Stink wrote: It appears to me that all three stink. Even all perfumes don't smell the same.
This is true. There's nothing anyone in Mississippi can be proud of. Abysmal funding is compounded by a society deeply hostile to the free thought and tolerance that are the foundation of elite universities.. Compare it to North Carolina, which has raided our faculty so successfully. Its leading private university--Duke-- is #5 overall; UNC-CH is #5 among publics; Davidson and Wake Forest are top liberal arts colleges; NCSU, UNCG and UNC-Asheville are also highly ranked in their catagories.
I remind you once more: Fleming warned us this was happening. An IHL core that wanted to see USM put in its place, or should I say Mississippi Southern put back in its place. To that formula, add a bunch of ignorant car dealers, and IHL's little cabal got their way. Shame on them. Shame on us for not listening to what we were being warned about.
Just remember that USM became a tier one Carnegie school in 2000, one of the objectives we had set for ourselves. Now, we may not even be able to hold on to that category. Anybody know if we got demoted or if we are still in that class?
Austin Eagle and others viewing these numbers, be sure to remember that USNews initially put the 1,400 schools into various "mission categories" (some are national universities, others are liberal arts colleges, etc.). You cannot compre the ranks of different schools if the schools are in different mission categories. The colleges in each category are ranked against their peers. They are not ranked against colleges in the other categories. It is not possible to compare Mississippi State's 2.4 score with the 2.4 scores of Alcorn or Mississippi Valey; or the 3.0 of Belhaven with the 2.7 of Ole Miss; or the 2.7 of Ole Miss with the 3.3 of Mississippi University for Women. I used this format only as a convenient way of presenting the peer assessment scores themselves. It would have probably been best if I had listed the 13 schools alphabetically so that viewers would not tend to interpret the scores on a comparative basis. The peer assessment scores can be compared only if the schools are in the same mission category.
Thanks for the tutorial, but I did understand the nature of the rankings when I made my earlier comment. You made it clear with your original post. I was lamenting the generally low peer ranking of USM, not their apparent place in the state's pecking order. I do believe that if one were to poll Mississippi residents for their perception of the "quality" of the state's public and private institutions, USM would likely rank below Ole Miss, MSU, MUW, Millsaps, Mississippi College, and Bellhaven. At least that's the impression I've formed after many conversations with Mississipians over the course of the past year. I find it more than sad, tragic isn't even too strong a word, that an institution with such energy and promise only two years ago has fallen so quickly.
we are still in that carnegie category, but carnegie is completely changing its ranking system for the next go around. different criteria, etc. go to its website and you can get a sense (but not much detail) of where the new system is heading.
it will be interesting to see if any of the local and/or state media report any of this and if so, what "spin" they put on this. given the paucity of coverage on state act scores, i'm not expecting much.
Wonder if the newspapers are interviewing the car dealers, or Giannini for that matter, for quotes on this.
Surely the HA or The Student Printz should carry an article on this news. I would be particularly interested to know how the administration will explain the continued Tier 4 status, since last year that status was blamed on a mistake. Presumably the mistake was corrected this year (i.e., all relevant data were submitted), yet USM has actually slipped a bit from the year in which NO information was submitted!