For all of the hubbub made about using logic, facts, and rational discussion on this message board, I frankly don't see much of it. I have read a number of posts recently that attacked this poster or that poster for not using factual information or logical deduction (or induction) when they were making their point(s).
It's pretty easy to say that sort of thing when you're able to make the rules and have a gang to back you up. I'd be willing to bet that none of you would last in a real debate contest where you have to argue a point of view that may not be aligned with your personal beliefs. That's true debate.
What you're doing here is a farce of such a high quality I've not seen in 20+ years of coaching debate at the university level. I'm glad one of my former students (who now teaches at USM) turned me on to this website; it's great when I need a good laugh.
The quality debate faculty have already left USM or were fired tenured faculty members. We had some good debate teamers at USM, but they were recently kicked off the team for posting to this message board. Team rules, boards like this where intellectual street brawls can be found are off limits. These student-debaters could not resist, sadly Another controversy, we have a blue-chip debater joining us this year, but he has a sordid past, pulling a gun on an opponent in the US high school national debate chamionship after he thought he might lose. His defense was quite logical, might makes right, just look at how the government works. He actually ended up winning believe it or not, but the Ivy league schools saw him as tainted. So USM thought they could bring him to the Harvard of Hardy, not of Hattiesburg mind you, William Carey and Anotelli are fighting for this now. His arrival on campus is very controversial, but we expect a chamionship out of this fellow. Logic is for the weak. You only argue when you are weak.
Have you noticed that both "Doubting Thomas" and " Parallel Universe" use the word "Attacked" in place of the word "Rebutted"? I do believe the troll is back on at least 2 threads tonight. I'll let you guess which threads.
Observer wrote: Have you noticed that both "Doubting Thomas" and " Parallel Universe" use the word "Attacked" in place of the word "Rebutted"? I do believe the troll is back on at least 2 threads tonight. I'll let you guess which threads.
You're really reaching, here. I am not "Parallel Universe".
Observer wrote: Have you noticed that both "Doubting Thomas" and " Parallel Universe" use the word "Attacked" in place of the word "Rebutted"? I do believe the troll is back on at least 2 threads tonight. I'll let you guess which threads.
The more I think about this stupid line of reasoning the more I realize that I can't let you get away with this nonsense. By your flawed logic, I am every poster who has used the work "attacked" when describing the manner in which I was treated by posters of your ilk. Shame on you for such sloppy reasoning.
Where is the general outcry when someone like "Observer" is besmirching my (pseudo) name with such shoddy reasoning?
Observer wrote: Have you noticed that both "Doubting Thomas" and " Parallel Universe" use the word "Attacked" in place of the word "Rebutted"? I do believe the troll is back on at least 2 threads tonight. I'll let you guess which threads.
Both seem to have this place confused with a high school debate tournament, too. If they're not the same person, they're a tag team.
And now for a little musical interlude, courtesy of the Judds (Naomi, Wynonna & Stephen, no doubt!)
Workin' in the troll mine Goin' on down, down Workin' in a troll mine Oops, about to slip down Workin' in a troll mine Goin' on down, down Workin' in a troll mine Oops, about to slip down
Ah, then Devo covered it in the 80s. Disclaimer: admitting that I know this in no way makes me either youthful or inexperienced (unfortunately). But, could someone tell the old guy (DT) with the short fuse to knock it off?