Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: IHL May minutes -- first pass (legal fees)
ask stinky

Date:
RE: IHL May minutes -- first pass (legal fees)
Permalink Closed


A matter of record wrote:


$107,589.05 The above entry indicates that the statement from Adams & Reese was dated 8/31/04. This raises the question as to why it is just now being entered into the board minutes. Are such matters entered only once per year or was there a specific reason for the delay? Could it be that controversial data such as these were deliberately delayed from being made public until after IHL made the decision about the USM presidency for the next two years? Or maybe there was another reason. Anybody know why the delay?

Has anybody got to the bottom of this yet?

__________________
Googler

Date:
Permalink Closed

ask stinky wrote:


A matter of record wrote: $107,589.05 The above entry indicates that the statement from Adams & Reese was dated 8/31/04. This raises the question as to why it is just now being entered into the board minutes. Are such matters entered only once per year or was there a specific reason for the delay? Could it be that controversial data such as these were deliberately delayed from being made public until after IHL made the decision about the USM presidency for the next two years? Or maybe there was another reason. Anybody know why the delay? Has anybody got to the bottom of this yet?

This sounds like a job for Bob Pittman and The Independent.

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 | Page of 3  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard