Is Seeker A Troll? - USM Forum -- Message Board

Date: Jun 9, 2005

Is Seeker A Troll?

Date: Jun 9, 2005

Troll Zapper has determined that your profile does not match that of a Troll at the present time.

Date: Jun 9, 2005

Troll Zapper wrote:

Troll Zapper has determined that your profile does not match that of a Troll at the present time.

Well, maybe if I work really hard, put in the overtime and offend enough people I can work my way up.

Date: Jun 9, 2005

Sorry, Seeker, but you aren't a troll. I hope this isn't too devastating.

You see, you actually defend your statements & make sense over time. You don't much engage in the old ad hominem & truth be told, your spelling is no worse than Stephen Judd's.

Contrarian? Yes. Unpopular opinions? Sure. But I don't think your overarching goal is to disrupt or destroy this group.

Again, I hope you're not too disappointed that I don't think you are a troll.

Date: Jun 10, 2005

Invictus wrote:

Sorry, Seeker, but you aren't a troll. I hope this isn't too devastating.

You see, you actually defend your statements & make sense over time. You don't much engage in the old ad hominem & truth be told, your spelling is no worse than Stephen Judd's.

Contrarian? Yes. Unpopular opinions? Sure. But I don't think your overarching goal is to disrupt or destroy this group.

Again, I hope you're not too disappointed that I don't think you are a troll.

Ah, how soon we forget. Does no one else remember the mean-spirited remarks he used to make about women (specifically, single mothers) on the Fire Shelby board? And how he used to blame specific faculty members for the problems at USM? Perhaps he is a reformed troll, but a troll nonetheless.

Date: Jun 10, 2005

I don't think enough people are voting for option #3.

Date: Jun 10, 2005

Invictus wrote:

truth be told, your spelling is no worse than Stephen Judd's.

Prof. Judd can spell. He just can't type!

Date: Jun 10, 2005

Some of us are just too busy trying to understand the recently revealed connection between Green Hornet, Monique de Guerre, Hermione Angleterre, Judge Cooley, and Seeker. Just when I thought I had it all sorted out...

Date: Jun 10, 2005

Phylogenetic Tree wrote:

Some of us are just too busy trying to understand the recently revealed connection between Green Hornet, Monique de Guerre, Hermione Angleterre, Judge Cooley, and Seeker. Just when I thought I had it all sorted out...

Judge Cooley??? Did I miss something???? Is he back? I sure do miss that guy. I imagine he is on Mlle de Guerre's list of Gentleman callers. And I bet he never goes sockless.

Date: Jun 10, 2005

Note to foot soldier: as a married gentleman, of course Judge Cooley is an Honorary Gentleman Caller.

Date: Jun 10, 2005

H.A. wrote:

Note to foot soldier: as a married gentleman, of course Judge Cooley is an Honorary Gentleman Caller.

Of course. That goes without saying, ma'am.

Date: Jun 10, 2005

Invictus wrote:

Sorry, Seeker, but you aren't a troll. I hope this isn't too devastating. You see, you actually defend your statements & make sense over time. You don't much engage in the old ad hominem & truth be told, your spelling is no worse than Stephen Judd's. Contrarian? Yes. Unpopular opinions? Sure. But I don't think your overarching goal is to disrupt or destroy this group. Again, I hope you're not too disappointed that I don't think you are a troll.

ouch!

Actually Invictus, blame my finger please . . . and the fact that I am still a hunt and peck typist after all these years . . . the fingers just can't keep up with the flow . . . .

But I agree that Seeker is not a trool, although there are times when he seems deliberately obtuse . . . but I will assume it to be al in good fun.

Date: Jun 10, 2005

stephen judd wrote:

Invictus wrote: Sorry, Seeker, but you aren't a troll. I hope this isn't too devastating. You see, you actually defend your statements & make sense over time. You don't much engage in the old ad hominem & truth be told, your spelling is no worse than Stephen Judd's. Contrarian? Yes. Unpopular opinions? Sure. But I don't think your overarching goal is to disrupt or destroy this group. Again, I hope you're not too disappointed that I don't think you are a troll. ouch! Actually Invictus, blame my finger please . . . and the fact that I am still a hunt and peck typist after all these years . . . the fingers just can't keep up with the flow . . . . But I agree that Seeker is not a trool, although there are times when he seems deliberately obtuse . . . but I will assume it to be al in good fun.

Troll

Date: Jun 10, 2005

Hmmm... I sure wish my prof in the old "Advanced Expository Prose" course would've accepted the "my fingers malfunctioned" excuse for all my speling errers.

Date: Jun 10, 2005

Seeker, you are not a troll. You are full of youthful enthusiasm, have a less than fully developed understanding of the world of academics, and possess strongly held opinions, which you share freely. Time and experience will wrought change in all of these aspects of your life as it has in many of us of a more advanced age.

Date: Jun 10, 2005

maybe i should try for attention as a troll?

Date: Jun 10, 2005

scm, only if you have crazy hair

Date: Jun 10, 2005

lvn--i have both crazy hair and crazy shirts.

Date: Jun 11, 2005

I once had crazy hair. Now I have no hair.

Date: Jun 11, 2005

Richard Simmons?

Date: Jun 11, 2005

Sweatin' to the Oldies wrote:

Richard Simmons?

Close but no leotard.

Date: Jun 11, 2005

Is that an old picture of Bob Weir?

Date: Jun 11, 2005

Could it be Bobby Z?

Date: Jun 11, 2005

Third Witch wrote:

Could it be Bobby Z?

No, but the kid wanted to look like the cover of Blonde on Blonde, yeah.

Date: Jun 12, 2005

Has anyone considered the possibility that Seeker is an Administrator of an ancillary part of USM, and he works on campus?

Date: Jun 13, 2005

kick

Date: Jun 13, 2005

Private I wrote:

Has anyone considered the possibility that Seeker is an Administrator of an ancillary part of USM, and he works on campus?

Are you asking if we have considered the possibility that the story Seeker gives about working in Richmond is contrived? I wouldn't know about that, but I do believe it is possible that Seeker may eventually obtain employment at USM. Family ties in employment decisions sometimes appear to be important in employment matters here. Seeker appears to be well connected.