quote: Originally posted by: Swift Justice "There is validity. The Director knows how little he does and will do nothing about it. The Dean knows that the Director is not doing his job, like the golf/accounting professor, and he chooses to do nothing. Is it any wonder the Provost and/or President continues to micro-manage the College? My hunch is if the CoB had a dean viewed as competent by the President and the faculty, there would be far less micro-managing, and more communication with and through the dean. I have had enough of the administrators who are not performing their jobs. I understand that Thames ultimately makes the calls, but that is always true. If, as in this case, a chairman/director knows of a continuing problem and chooses to do nothing, that person should resign. In my opinion, they are stealing their paycheck, at least the administrator part (however large or small that part is). They should resign from the job if they will not perform it. If this faculty member does not teach his or her classes the appropriate subject material, and instead chooses to talk about golf, he too should be removed for not doing his job if he is unwilling to change."
This is very interesting, Swift Justice. You must be a very powerful person at USM. You just made an assertion, without evidence, that could only be made by someone with access to the evaluations of the chair, director and dean of CoB. Do you have that information or are you just blowing off steam based in ignorance and person opinion? Please let us know so that we can evaluate you post to this board. Everyone has opinions, but they are not all equal.
Do all members of the pro-Shelby contingent take a course in faulty logic? Your premise is that the prof in question is not doing his job. Your proof is that he is frequently seen golfing during the day. As your underlying foundation is false, the arguments you build from it are irrelevant.
quote: Originally posted by: First Fallacy " Do all members of the pro-Shelby contingent take a course in faulty logic? Your premise is that the prof in question is not doing his job. Your proof is that he is frequently seen golfing during the day. As your underlying foundation is false, the arguments you build from it are irrelevant. "
See what I mean. Students don't count. I was in the class. Ask anyone who was in the class, they will tell you the same thing. He taught golf. He didn't teach accounting. I went to one of the professors who does care and he spent his time teaching a bunch of us. That's the only way we learned anything.
quote: Originally posted by: First Fallacy " Do all members of the pro-Shelby contingent take a course in faulty logic? Your premise is that the prof in question is not doing his job. Your proof is that he is frequently seen golfing during the day. As your underlying foundation is false, the arguments you build from it are irrelevant. "
It is you who are assuming or do not want to see. Saying there are some faculty members who are not doing their jobs does not mean that someone is pro-Thames or anti-Thames. It simply states either fact or opinion.
Faculty are evaluated in three areas. If teaching is talking golf primarily, then that category should have a low score. Service is minimal, research is less than that. How would you score any faculty member with such factors? I could not care less if he plays golf. He can play all day, every day. My point is when he is supposed to be in the classroom teaching accounting, but he chooses to waste time about golf, that is a problem. If you do not see that, I believe you have the logic problem.
The best measure of teaching is learning. For many years the accounting graduates of USM have had the highest pass rate and scores on the CPA exam of any Mississippi school. If the outcome is good, the hours or hobbies of the faculty are not an issue. If the pass rate begins to fall (as with Nursing), then the spotlight needs to focus on the dean, chair, and faculty as well as administration policies that affect their program.
quote: Originally posted by: LeavingASAP " This is very interesting, Swift Justice. You must be a very powerful person at USM. You just made an assertion, without evidence, that could only be made by someone with access to the evaluations of the chair, director and dean of CoB. Do you have that information or are you just blowing off steam based in ignorance and person opinion? Please let us know so that we can evaluate you post to this board. Everyone has opinions, but they are not all equal."
You assume without evidence. Your mistake. Your bias. How many students - students you know or have taught in other classes throughout the CoB - does it take saying the same thing to make you a believer? On this point, why would students lie? They need to learn the material in that course for future courses in their discipline, and are frustrated that the person paid to teach them does not do so. It takes no "power" to see reality, unless you choose not to do so.
Playing golf does not make anyone anything but a golfer. Again, he can play all day. Publications tend to be known over time, and service - at least committee assignments - are known. Is that not insight into whether or not a faculty member is performing okay or not? Further, assuming these statements are true for now, wouldn't a supervisor knowing these things but doing nothing about them be avoiding his or her job?
I think the board should be really careful about impugning a faculty member's good name without cause. "Accounting Student" may or may not be a student.
quote: Originally posted by: Swift Justice "students . . .They need to learn the material in that course for future courses in their discipline . . . Playing golf does not make anyone anything but a golfer."
I repeat: The best measure of teaching is learning. For many years the accounting graduates of USM have had the highest pass rate and scores on the CPA exam of any Mississippi school. If the outcome is good, the hours or hobbies of the faculty are not an issue. If the pass rate begins to fall (as with Nursing), then the spotlight needs to focus on the dean, chair, and faculty as well as administration policies that affect their program.
USM no longer shows up in the awards list of new CPAs as they did in the 80s. Check out the awards presented in the MS. Society of CPAs newsletters. Sad but true that it is not the leader it was in the past.
quote: Originally posted by: Swift Justice " assuming these statements are true for now, wouldn't a supervisor knowing these things but doing nothing about them be avoiding his or her job? "
Ding, ding, ding...there you go! That's the assumption several of us have been unwilling to make at this juncture. Without that assumption, the rest of your argument is moot.
quote: Originally posted by: First Fallacy "Ding, ding, ding...there you go! That's the assumption several of us have been unwilling to make at this juncture. Without that assumption, the rest of your argument is moot."
Have it your way. None so blind as those who will not see. Enjoy it.
quote: Originally posted by: Legal Advisor "I think the board should be really careful about impugning a faculty member's good name without cause. "Accounting Student" may or may not be a student. "
First of all, I haven't noticed that the faculty member's name (good or otherwise) has been mentioned. However, everyone seems to know exactly who it is. Maybe that speaks to the veracity of the claims. What I have seen on this board is that if you don't like someone, every accusation no matter how outrageous, has to be true.
By the way, how do any of us know that others on the bard are who they pretend to be?
quote: Originally posted by: Legal Advisor "I think the board should be really careful about impugning a faculty member's good name without cause. "Accounting Student" may or may not be a student.
"
Fair point.
I disagree "impugning" was at all happening, but you lawyers like to throw sand in everything.
quote: Originally posted by: Proud Former Faculty " First of all, I haven't noticed that the faculty member's name (good or otherwise) has been mentioned. However, everyone seems to know exactly who it is. Maybe that speaks to the veracity of the claims. What I have seen on this board is that if you don't like someone, every accusation no matter how outrageous, has to be true. By the way, how do any of us know that others on the bard are who they pretend to be? "
quote: Originally posted by: JoJo "The problem is that you have an Accounting PROF making over $100,000 playing golf at noon every day at the Country Club"
I have spent many of my noon hours engaging in my hobby (which is not golf). What's it to you, JoJo. It's really none of your **** business.
quote: Originally posted by: I did it my way "I have spent many of my noon hours engaging in my hobby (which is not golf). What's it to you, JoJo. It's really none of your **** business. "
I once got a haircut during Noon. I hope JoJo didn't see me in the barber shop.
quote: Originally posted by: Accounting Student "See what I mean. Students don't count. I was in the class. Ask anyone who was in the class, they will tell you the same thing. He taught golf. He didn't teach accounting. I went to one of the professors who does care and he spent his time teaching a bunch of us. That's the only way we learned anything."
Then, Accounting Student, the prof should have received very low teaching evaluations in at least one class if this perception of yours reflects the majority of the class. Have you seen his teaching evaluations? Could he have gotten high evaluations in other classes? Maybe he does outstanding research and service.
All I'm saying is you can’t properly evaluate the situation. Trying to do so without the facts is a waste of time. This is why the general public get so confused about academia. But go ahead and have fun. We will be here to rebut ignorant comments.
Originally posted by: Swift Justice " You assume without evidence. Your mistake. Your bias.
Oops, you forgot to quote or show what I assumed without evidence. I stated fact. You can't evaluate performance without evidence or data. You supplied antidotal evidence of your and other student’s opinions of his teaching in one course. That isn't enough to begin post tenure review. It is overall performance evaluation that is needed.
How many students - students you know or have taught in other classes throughout the CoB - does it take saying the same thing to make you a believer?
About 15 to 20 % of the class would concern me. But I would also look at grade distribution and other evidence of student learning, not just opinion. I have look al all teaching evaluations and not just one course.
On this point, why would students lie?
I don't know, but I don't have the burden to prove that. Why assume they tell the truth. If you start assuming, you have the burden of evidence. Note I never said students lied about their opinion of his teaching. I just wanted to point our a logical fallacy
.
They need to learn the material in that course for future courses in their discipline, and are frustrated that the person paid to teach them does not do so. It takes no "power" to see reality, unless you choose not to do so.
I had complaints from students stated in a similar way. But when we discussed it at length with the students, their complaints were that I wasn't telling them what to memorize for test. I was making them think and problem solve and they never had to do that before. They considered that bad teaching because they wanted to be taught like junior high.
Playing golf does not make anyone anything but a golfer. Again, he can play all day. Publications tend to be known over time, and service - at least committee assignments - are known. Is that not insight into whether or not a faculty member is performing okay or not? Further, assuming these statements are true for now, wouldn't a supervisor knowing these things but doing nothing about them be avoiding his or her job? "
This depends. It some situations the faculty are evaluated 40% teaching, 40% research and 20% service. You relate that he is terrible in teaching one course. I assume this to be true, but as I keep pointing out, that isn't even his whole teaching evaluation much less the overall evaluation.
quote: Originally posted by: JoJo "AAUP loves to shoot the messanger. The hell with the truth!!!"
JoJo speculates, asserts without evidence, doesn't answer questions, gives unsupported opinions and destroys communication. To hell with facts and truth!!!
quote: Originally posted by: outlook " At about 3:15 this afternoon I saw USM's athletic director turning into Canebrake subdivision. A-Did Mr G have a golfing date at Canebrake Golf Club B-Does Mr G live at Canebrake subdivision C-If "A" does that make him a lazy AD D-All of the above JoJo could you please help me with these questions?"
I did see Gianny at 3:15 turning into Canebrake....I was just funning on the questions.
Does this guy have the right to go home, play golf, etc.....darn right he does, just as accounting professors, english instructors or polymer scientist IF they are salaried employees and are meeting the other requirements of their job.
Cool down and enjoy Shelby's last days
Anyone thought of getting a pool going on Shelby's last "official" day on the job?
If I should win the pool the prize goes to the G&S Scholarship!!
I've stumbled across several of JoJo's posts today. He/she appears to have one agenda...attack the faculty...he/she has presented no facts, no logical arguments, just assaults on the faculty. Ignore it...maybe it will go away.