Now, I'm not saying that our president has not done something like this here. . .don't know if he has or not. But I'm impressed by President Lee -- not a call for more alumni to give money but to get involved by contacting the legislature. (Of course, I wish I'd gotten this before 4:30 pm)
As you probably know, this is proving to be a very difficult year for the Mississippi Legislature to balance the needs of the state with available revenues. The problem is more acute because one-time funds have been used over the past three years to keep higher education and other parts of state government from experiencing even more drastic cuts.
The Joint Legislative Budget Committee has made recommendations to the House of Representatives and the Senate that would reduce state support to MSU by more than $23 million, for a decrease of 15.6 percent from last year’s funding level. Other universities would incur similar cuts. The current disarray suggests to us that these reductions could possibly be adopted, coming in addition to the reductions we have experienced in recent years. If this happens, the consequences will be drastic for every aspect of the university’s operation.
Because of the size of the possible cuts, it is not feasible to offset such reductions through tuition increases. And for the units of the Division of Agriculture, Forestry, and Veterinary Medicine, tuition increases are not an option, in any case. Accommodating such cuts will necessitate personnel reductions, reduced availability of classes, and extended time to graduation for MSU students, as well as reductions in our capacity to assist industry, agriculture, and the people and organizations of the state that are served by MSU.
We need your assistance in helping our policymakers understand that ALL of education is important to the future of our state. We recognize our responsibility to take a fair share of necessary reductions, and are prepared to do so. Our fear, however, is that current events may result in higher education bearing a disproportionate share of the anticipated cuts. We urge you to contact one or more of the following individuals by the close of business today. Ask them to treat higher education in a manner that is equitable in relation to other levels of education in the state.
Please contact:
House Speaker Billy McCoy – (601) 359-3300
House Appropriations Chairman Johnny Stringer – (601) 359-3340
House Education Chairman Cecil Brown – (601) 359-3330
House Agriculture Chairman Bo Eaton – (601) 359-3329
Lieutenant Governor Amy Tuck – (601) 359-3200
Senate Appropriations Chairman Jack Gordon – (601) 359-3250
Senate Education Chairman Mike Chaney – (601) 359-2936
If this kind of cut transpires (15.6%) the faculty losses over the past couple of years may look small. A 15.6% cut sytem wide would almost certainly lead to RIF plans being implemented. Ususally that means that untenured faculty are dismissed first...
quote: Originally posted by: PALINDROME "If this kind of cut transpires (15.6%) the faculty losses over the past couple of years may look small. A 15.6% cut sytem wide would almost certainly lead to RIF plans being implemented. Ususally that means that untenured faculty are dismissed first..."
As if the current nationally visible storm over USM isn't enough, this RIF information alone would cause me to pause before taking an untenured faculty position at USM.
Educators on all levels-local systems,jr.college,universties,etc.-should just photocopy this message and send it out every year.I've been in Miss. 40+ years and we hear the same thing every year. There will never be enough money to satisfy the education lobby.The only thing this message lacks is a reference to how we are "hurting the children."
If this occurs the IHL needs to start closing universities immediately. There is no reason for Mississippi to have more than 4 state funded universities.
There is no reason for Mississippi to have more than 4 state funded universities."
If only four state funded universities survive, Ole Miss would be one of them as the legislator's choice, Missississippi State would survive as the land grant school, and Jackson State would survive as Mississippi's urban university. Which would be the fourth?
I would guess Miss. University for Women (or "the W") in Columbus would survive any massive education cuts that threatened to shut down the state's other universities.
The majority of the W's students are young women and the school has a smally, homey feel to it. I would bet this "unique" school would get a lot of legislative attention, particularly because many of the current legislators' mothers may have been taught there I'd wager. The school's historical legacy could also play a part.
"W," I'm betting, would also have some leverage because of its location near MSU. While this might seem like a detriment [and with Ole Miss, MSU, JSU, and MUW as the four state schools, leave the entire southern half of the state empty to higher ed] I could also see it used as a ploy that State and W could share larger resources. I've driven from the Starkville campus to the Columbus campus in under 45 minutes (shorter commute than Hattiesburg-GC).
As a side note, however, I think its worth mentioning that if we're playing this "Which four would survive?" game, Mississippi's historically black universities have strong leverage, particularly in light of Ayres. If IHL closed all HBUs but Jackson State, and instead left open Ole Miss, MSU, the W or USM, let's say, I'm willing to bet it'd make quite a controversy, attraction lots of media attention, and even bring about lawsuits.
It would also be a shame to our state if a school like Valley State was closed. While its academic rigor or research activities may not be quite as up to par as some would like, it serves a critical need in the Delta, where for non-upper-middle-class [particularly white] folks higher education has been hard to come by for generations.
I could also see Alcorn State as a wildcard "saved" university. I think you're right--there's absolutely no question that Ole Miss, MSU, and Jackson State would be spared from the chopping block. I could see Alcorn State, the W, or Valley State for the fourth (and final, in this little game of our's) spot. I don't see USM being "saved," unless it was specifically the Gulf Coast Campus (to serve the bottom half of our state). Unfortunately I can't think of any "pull" (save the polymer science shpiel) that could be compelling enough to our legislators.
quote: Originally posted by: W is for Women "The majority of the W's students are young women.."
True. But I seem to recall that some years ago a male student who wanted to enter their nursing program sued and gained entrance, at which point the school essentially became coeducational.