Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: SH article on Business Meeting
Angeline

Date:
SH article on Business Meeting
Permalink Closed


http://www.sunherald.com/mld/sunherald/living/education/11095642.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp

__________________
Robert Campbell

Date:
Permalink Closed

The Coca-Cola cowboys are running for cover.


RC



__________________
they can run but they can't hide

Date:
Permalink Closed

Let's not let them get away with it so easily.  We should call this writer's attention to these business leaders' ever changing stories.

__________________
truth4usm/AH

Date:
Permalink Closed

Money quote:

"The only involvement my office has had was to provide information, which we would do for any group that asked for it," Mader said.

Unless you are the university's own faculty members asking for the CV of a current administrator!

Gimme a break...plus why does this group have to meet to "get the good word out" about USM when Lisa Mader is highly paid to do that? Plus all of the money spent on huge banners???? Why not put the "good news" on those???



__________________
foot soldier

Date:
Permalink Closed

Since when is 300 people a "small group"?

(Oh, I know, when they're voting no confidence, hundreds is not enough . . . .)

__________________
changing their story

Date:
Permalink Closed

kick

__________________
USM Sympathizer

Date:
Permalink Closed

"Lacy said the meeting was not open to the public because the committee wanted to start with a small group. She said the media wasn't invited because they want those who attend to feel they can speak freely."


I don't get it (actually, I *do* get it): why are they reluctant to "speak freely" in front of reporters or on the record?  If they are afraid that the full, subtle nuances of their comments won't be reported, then tape the meeting and release the tape to anyone who wants to listen to it. 



__________________
LeavingASAP

Date:
Permalink Closed

quote:

Originally posted by: USM Sympathizer

""Lacy said the meeting was not open to the public because the committee wanted to start with a small group. She said the media wasn't invited because they want those who attend to feel they can speak freely." I don't get it (actually, I *do* get it): why are they reluctant to "speak freely" in front of reporters or on the record?  If they are afraid that the full, subtle nuances of their comments won't be reported, then tape the meeting and release the tape to anyone who wants to listen to it.  "


Remember this quote from the H.A. article?  (I can't believe the thread is already on page 5.)


"Hattiesburg businessman Carl Nicholson, a former College Board member, questioned the media coverage of Southern Miss. Asked about access to the meeting, Nicholson cited the Faculty Senate's holding closed-door executive sessions when media members must leave.

"I don't see anything wrong with us having a private meeting," Nicholson said. "We still have that right under the Constitution to assemble, don't we?" "


http://www.hattiesburgamerican.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050305/NEWS01/503050301/1002



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard