Do I remember correctly a guest editorial to the HA early last summer by Carl Nicholson and then a point by point rejoinder by Gene Saucier? Maybe not, because I can't find it. If anyone else can, it might be a nice way to review and prep for tomorrow.
before Saucier sends his letter to other outlets i hope he corrects the following factual error: "USM has been subject to ridicule from other universities for having been listed in the Chronicle as the only four-year university on probation in the country." Hardly. It's not the only four-year university on probation in SACS.
quote: Originally posted by: "not to mention the nation which some of us know extends beyond the deep south."
I'm shocked! This is the second letter in The Sun Herald this week. I bet Robert Campbell will be shocked also after that long drought where the S.H. could see no evil, hear no evil and published no evil about USM.
For the "out-of-towners," it's worthy of reporting that Gene Saucier has been a long-time TRUE friend of the university, and has served in the Mississippi state legislature. He was one of the voices of support for education, and chose not to run for re-election.
Excellent letter! I am shocked that the S-H is now publishing letters that question SFT. I had written them off as a potential place to which such letters could profitably be submitted. Previous letters of mine published in the HA and CL were ignored by the SH; I may have to reconsider writing to them, and I hope others will reconsider, too. Thanks very much to Gene Saucier!
here's another old one from the HA, linked on the AAUP front page:
Thames lacks temperament, skills to lead university
To hear Dave Elliot of WLOX-TV state last Sunday evening that Shelby Thames told him he was hired by the Board of Trustees of State Institutions of Higher Learning to "clean house at USM" amazed me.
Until I heard this assertion, I was laboring under the obvious delusion that USM was a pretty fine university, one at least as good as Mississippi State and Ole Miss.
Now, it seems, we have been harboring an institution in our midst riddled with bad professors and rampant mismanagement. For 23 years I served as a top administrator under USM presidents William McCain and Aubrey Lucas. And while I did not agree with all of their decisions, I saw no evidence of gross mismanagement. I did see a university on the rise, one that was an asset to South Mississippi with the promise, because of its faculty, of becoming even better.
In the late 1970s Shelby Thames was promoted to the position of vice president of regional campuses. Almost immediately he began to put such pressure on his subordinates that he created turmoil and unrest among them.
In spite of this record, Dr. Lucas chose to name him executive vice president of USM. In this larger arena, Shelby's management techniques created even greater unrest and dissension.
Dr. Lucas finally called a special meeting at the Gulf Park campus with his deans and top administrators to consider how the unrest could be ended and peace restored to the university community. Not until the second day -- when Dr. Lucas promised to write a letter stating that he would tolerate no reprisals against any administrator for any comments made and they had a copy of this letter in their hands -- were the deans and other administrators willing to state their true feelings and concerns about Shelby's leadership.
At the close of the discussion Dr. Lucas asked whether they thought Shelby could change enough to become a competent administrator. Of the 15 people who were present, only Dr. Karen Yarbrough, a close associate of Shelby's, voted yes.
Sadly, Shelby was allowed to continue as executive vice president in spite of this overwhelming vote of no confidence until he stepped down following an incident concerning a personnel matter. In spite of the guarantee by Dr. Lucas that Shelby would not be able to take reprisals against us, all of the deans became a target of Shelby's petty vindictiveness.
Some became physically ill as a result; some stepped down and others left the university.
Shelby Thames has neither the temperament nor the people skills necessary to provide leadership to a university community. He is incapable of seeing any way but his as the the right way and, like an elephant, never forgets what he perceives as an injury done to him.
I have known him for nearly 40 years and was instrumental in helping him rise in the university, though I deeply regret that fact. The bottom-liners and power-brokers who put Shelby in as president will, if they do not demand his resignation, live to regret it.
If past history is not a warning, nothing is.
--Gene D. Saucier, a resident of Hattiesburg, is a former member of the Mississippi House of Representatives