"Besides offering a bargain-basement location, Hattiesburg lured Hybrid with the promise of a close relationship with the University of Southern Mississippi's highly regarded polymer chemistry department. Hattiesburg became irresistible when the state promised to make university equipment and laboratory space available at virtually no cost."
My archaeology laboratory has been condemned by USM safety. There's mold and a weak spot in the floor that someone (like a student!) could fall through. When my chair asked for space for my lab, after months, he received email from Cynthia Moore that I should get a grant to rent lab space off campus!
Of course, in archaeology one cannot get any grant or contract without FIRST having a lab. This has yet to be resolved.
quote: Originally posted by: head in sack "I didn't know usm had surplus laboratory space. "
From past observations around USA: Surplus lab space can be defined as "YOUR lab space IF you are not bringing in money they can use via a grant." This type of definition would also apply to equipment and support personnel. If you have no grant you are subject to having things taken, including office space, labs, equipment, and people.
quote: Originally posted by: Crighton Fan I think this is old news
The news itself may be old, but the article is from yesterday's New York Times. There is quite a bit in the NYT article that I had not previously heard.
But if you were to get a grant and rent space off-campus, USM wouldn't get the overhead on the use of the space. And the upper administration wouldn't like that...
Of course the bigger lesson is that universities have to make considerable investments to be competitive for grants in the first place. And how is USM going to be able to do that, except in a handful of established areas.
Kickback,
This evening, when I'm not writing three different job-related things, I'll go through the L and P archives and link to that "uneasy truce" item. Good that you thought of it--the mood on this Board is highly reminiscent of certain periods last summer, with heavy trolling and lots of squabbling amongst the regulars.
I'm increasingly convinced that there's an uneasy truce on the Board as well. Seeing Klumb on WDAM last Thursday (thank you, Sad Eagle, for those clips) convinced me that Roy is definitely not a happy camper, and that there are enough anti-Thames forces on the Board to make things difficult for him--though not enough to censure him and fire his guy Thames immediately.
Robert Campbell
PS. The Hybrid Plastics deal, as described in the NYT, looks downright corrupt to me. But it wouldn't surprise me to learn that it's perfectly legal in Mississippi.
quote: Originally posted by: Amy Young "Outrageous! My archaeology laboratory has been condemned by USM safety. There's mold and a weak spot in the floor that someone (like a student!) could fall through. When my chair asked for space for my lab, after months, he received email from Cynthia Moore that I should get a grant to rent lab space off campus! Of course, in archaeology one cannot get any grant or contract without FIRST having a lab. This has yet to be resolved. No quarter! Amy Young"
Professor Young, this is not unlike your computer experience. C'est la Guerre.
quote: Originally posted by: Robert Campbell "PS. The Hybrid Plastics deal, as described in the NYT, looks downright corrupt to me. But it wouldn't surprise me to learn that it's perfectly legal in Mississippi."
It is perfectly legal in Mississippi.
This is a major economic development breakthrough, too, as we see from the article:
"Hybrid has just 14 employees locally and sales of under $5 million..."
So, in order to secure 14 jobs, the State of Mississippi condones giving free lab space (which Hybrid's CEO says would have cost $25M to build) to a company with less annual sales than John Grisham makes off a typical book. Yeah, it makes real good economic sense.
But we shouldn't holler about it. Probably most of the folks who read this board consider the Nissan plant to be a big feather in the state's cap. But Phil Pepper himself admitted in my presence that the state would never recover its costs to secure the Nissan deal.
Economic development in Mississippi is almost entirely about perception & not reality. This is sad, but the state's image is so rotten that the only way to "improve" it is to pay businesses to locate here. <SIGH> That's the rationale.
quote: Originally posted by: Robert Campbell ".... The Hybrid Plastics deal, as described in the NYT, looks downright corrupt to me. But it wouldn't surprise me to learn that it's perfectly legal in Mississippi."
Robert et al:
I have no idea whether the Hybrid Plastics arrangement meets legal muster in Mississippi, although I'd assume it was thoroughly vetted by state, USM, and Hybrid attorneys before being cemented. I will say that from what I've read of the arrangement in media accounts, it's simply a replication of a not-so-new public-private sector partnership that can be found at many prominent institutions. I know that similar agreements have been forged in Texas between UT-Austin, the city of Austin, and various scientific and high tech corporations, and in California at UC-Berkeley and Cal Tech, where great tax concessions and cheap or even free lab space and equipment are offered to lure high tech employers (and jobs) to their respective communities. I'm not defending the practice, or saying it's fair (I don't think it always is), but be assured that USM isn't breaking any new ground here.
quote: Originally posted by: Jimmy Brown "Heading South, Looking for an Edge Two brief sentences from the article: "Besides offering a bargain-basement location, Hattiesburg lured Hybrid with the promise of a close relationship with the University of Southern Mississippi's highly regarded polymer chemistry department. Hattiesburg became irresistible when the state promised to make university equipment and laboratory space available at virtually no cost.""
Cutting edge applied research....
The USM GGP Linguistic Group has determined that the new name for the university on Hardy Street is going to be SFT/ Hudsons Treasure Hunt U.....That explains the Albertson's/ Nursing School and Furniture Showroom. We can add the archaeology lab over by the old Starbucks zone--they used to have a microwave and cappucino in there. Amy, can you get a carbon date on that 70%-off couch???? Meanwhile we can take people's vitals while they dig through the piles of bargain ottoman (Empire?) cushions... It's a blood pressure control group and world civ class in one stop shopping!
__________________
Invictus
Date:
RE: RE: RE: USM makes today's Feb. 22 New York Tim
quote: Originally posted by: Scientist (not in Hattiesburg) "I know that similar agreements have been forged in Texas between UT-Austin, the city of Austin, and various scientific and high tech corporations, and in California at UC-Berkeley and Cal Tech, where great tax concessions and cheap or even free lab space and equipment are offered to lure high tech employers (and jobs) to their respective communities."
Last time I checked, Texas & California had a lot more fiscal resources than Mississippi. Mississippi is essentially bankrupt at the state level & to give up these kinds of concessions over fourteen jobs is kind of crazy. There is no way the state is going to recoup its costs from the state taxes paid by fourteen workers. Ironically, the very same politicians who scream the loudest for "welfare reform" are the ones who condone this sort of "corporate welfare." Every one of those fourteen salaries are welfare checks. Big welfare checks.
#34;I'm not defending the practice, or saying it's fair (I don't think it always is), but be assured that USM isn't breaking any new ground here."
But I thought USM was right out there being "innovative" about everything... <SIGH>
quote: Originally posted by: Spandex is an Economic Bad "So we can throw money away on a plane and give freebies to NY companies, but we can't buy books for the library?"
For what it's worth, Hybrid Plastics is based in Orange County, California, not NY. And as someone pointed out already, this is very old news. I think the Hybrid facility in Hattiesburg opened in September 2004. I wonder why it took so long to make the NYT, which as we all know, has an abiding interest in south Mississippi.
Tiny Thames said he would be here so long as he is having fun. Well, he's having fun. Aren't we? It must be a great feeling to get up in the morning and go in to work at a place where most folks feel you are an intellectual midget and the others think you must be smoking something to have such a high confidence level when all about you is in ruins because of your stupidity. Lisa Slay Mader can't even save him now.
__________________
Robert Campbell
Date:
RE: RE: RE: USM makes today's Feb. 22 New York Times
quote: Originally posted by: Invictus "But we shouldn't holler about it. Probably most of the folks who read this board consider the Nissan plant to be a big feather in the state's cap. But Phil Pepper himself admitted in my presence that the state would never recover its costs to secure the Nissan deal. Economic development in Mississippi is almost entirely about perception & not reality."
I've had a somewhat different view.
Part of the Nissan deal involved grabbing people's land (under an expansive interpretation of eminent domain) and turning it over to Nissan.
The Insitute for Justice and the NAACP got together to fight the confiscation of a family farm that was to be given to Nissan. They won.
A big case that originated when the city of New London, Connecticut, used eminent domain to seize an entire neighborhood and turn it over to corporate clients, went through oral arguments yesterday, in front of the US Supreme Court.
quote: Originally posted by: Scientist (not in Hattiesburg) " Robert et al: I have no idea whether the Hybrid Plastics arrangement meets legal muster in Mississippi, although I'd assume it was thoroughly vetted by state, USM, and Hybrid attorneys before being cemented. I will say that from what I've read of the arrangement in media accounts, it's simply a replication of a not-so-new public-private sector partnership that can be found at many prominent institutions. I know that similar agreements have been forged in Texas between UT-Austin, the city of Austin, and various scientific and high tech corporations, and in California at UC-Berkeley and Cal Tech, where great tax concessions and cheap or even free lab space and equipment are offered to lure high tech employers (and jobs) to their respective communities. I'm not defending the practice, or saying it's fair (I don't think it always is), but be assured that USM isn't breaking any new ground here. A Humble Scientist"
A big problem is that some current faculty members are not provided with adequate laboratory space for their research. I see USM as minor league - no, make that bush league- with respect to public-private sector partnerships.