TO: Drs. Harold Doty, Farhang Niroomand, Alvin Williams, Roderick Posey,
Mark Klinedinst, and President’s Executive Cabinet
FROM: Shelby F. Thames
President
I am sorry that there has been so much misunderstanding with respect to plans for an alternate delivery of your MBA program. Clearly, all aspects of the MBA degree are the responsibility of the faculty of the College of Business and include but may not be limited to curriculum, method of delivery, locations or sites offered, course schedules, faculty selection, and faculty credentials. When you and your colleagues have completed your work, we will, of course, pursue any necessary approvals from the IHL Board of Trustees, AACSB, and the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools and any other necessary accrediting body prior to implementation.
As University administrators you are acutely aware of our funding needs and the continual decline in state support for our University system. It appears this year will be no exception to the recent past and more budget cuts are expected. I have stated many times that the support of our educational mission primarily originates from three sources--tuition, state support, and external sources such as contracts, grants, and charitable foundations. Over the last several years, state support has declined, tuition has risen, and external funds have increased substantially due principally to the growth of our research component.
It is my belief that universities hold a unique position and responsibility to perform theoretical and fundamental research, as knowledge is created within our university borders. Therefore, we must continue our pursuit of theoretical and basic research in order to create knowledge for generations to come. Theoretical/basic research is the genesis of applied research and thus is indispensable to our economic and academic well being. I applaud your strong fundamental research component and encourage its propagation to societies’ needs.
Please know that I, as President, appreciate and support your efforts, and I encourage you to share this memorandum with your faculty.
As Invictus suggested on another thread, This is the set up for Jay Grimes to take the hit on this latest debacle. Wonder if that was the plan all along so that Shelby could circumvent and shortcut the committee search for a new provost.
This letter from Thames might give his buddies on the IHL Board all they need to keep him in place, but we all know - and hopefully Crofts and the IHL know too - that Shelby is behind all of this and is pulling another classic backdown after being caught with his hand in the cookie jar. How many retractions does this make now?
quote: Originally posted by: Angeline "This letter from Thames might give his buddies on the IHL Board all they need to keep him in place, but we all know - and hopefully Crofts and the IHL know too - that Shelby is behind all of this and is pulling another classic backdown after being caught with his hand in the cookie jar. How many retractions does this make now?"
quote: Originally posted by: Southern Will Rise Again "Whoever thought the business school would save the university from the corporatist model of a university? Whistlin' Dixie in OK"
Or, in corporate terms so fashionble at USM these days, "Whistling Winn Dixie is OK!"
I find it very telling that this letter begins "I am sorry..." Thames never uses this kind of language. It is always something like "I am disappointed that..." I think this proves he knows he is really in it this time and he is getting desperate.
quote: Originally posted by: Tiger "I find it very telling that this letter begins "I am sorry..." Thames never uses this kind of language. It is always something like "I am disappointed that..." I think this proves he knows he is really in it this time and he is getting desperate."
The letter from Grimes to Doty is dated February 3rd and Thames is copied on that letter. If there was inaccurate information in that letter (for example the order to stop research) then why did it take until February 11th for SFT to respond to it? Oh wait, I forgot, SFT never reads anything.
quote: Originally posted by: Tiger "The letter from Grimes to Doty is dated February 3rd and Thames is copied on that letter. If there was inaccurate information in that letter (for example the order to stop research) then why did it take until February 11th for SFT to respond to it? Oh wait, I forgot, SFT never reads anything."
USM Sympathizer: Is the temporal delay cited by Tiger part of the information you forwarded to the IHL?