Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Dr. Gunther in C.L.
Researcher

Date:
Dr. Gunther in C.L.
Permalink Closed


Higher education is economic development


  • Investment brings higher return to state in tax revenues
    http://clarionledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050129/OPINION/501290306/1166


  • __________________
    1st Time

    Date:
    Permalink Closed

    I've never put a bumper sticker on my car before but that was before I saw this one!


    "Solve the budget deficit: Invest in higher education"



    __________________
    Robert Campbell

    Date:
    Permalink Closed

    This op-ed is a first step in breaking the media silence.


    Gunther refrains from questioning Thames' pet program, but he is sending a clear message against killing the College of Business.


    There are some holes in the kind of analysis he is providing but I don't see Thames or Malone complaining about them.


    Robert Campbell



    __________________
    Invictus

    Date:
    Permalink Closed

    quote:
    Originally posted by: Robert Campbell

    "This op-ed is a first step in breaking the media silence."


    Frankly, I don't see what the big deal is here. The op-ed piece is utterly innocuous. From my own perspective, it is superficial.

    It's "nice" & that's how 99.9% of the people who read it are going to react: "How nice." Because it fails to call a spade a spade, any "hidden message" will be lost on almost everyone who reads it. In other words, it is subtle to the point that it can only be taken at face value.

    I'm stopping now, because my temptation at this point is to take potshots at the "analysis" & that would be counterproductive.

    __________________
    Mickey G.

    Date:
    Permalink Closed

    Maybe the piece was intended to help influence the budgeting process in the state.  It appears to suggest that any cut to the higher ed budget will lead to a reduction in future state revenue and that INVESTMENT in higher eduction is a long term solution to the budget problem.  Did you overlook an orchid while searching for a rose?

    __________________
    Invictus

    Date:
    Permalink Closed

    quote:
    Originally posted by: Mickey G.

    "Maybe the piece was intended to help influence the budgeting process in the state.  It appears to suggest that any cut to the higher ed budget will lead to a reduction in future state revenue and that INVESTMENT in higher eduction is a long term solution to the budget problem.  Did you overlook an orchid while searching for a rose?"


    I'm sure that's one reason for the op-ed piece. But if you've talked to anybody who's been around the Legislature this year, the only thing that's really going to help the budgeting process would be a U.S. Constitutional amendment allowing states to issue currency.

    One thing Gunther missed that I noticed -- and I'm not an economist -- is that the salaries earned by graduates who go out-of-state to work are probably a major influence on the $36K average he cites. Obviously, out-of-state workers do not pay Mississippi income tax. Believe me, Mississippi legislators aren't interested in increasing tax revenues in Georgia, Texas or Illinois!

    And business majors are trained to avoid paying taxes anyway!

    __________________
    The Shadow

    Date:
    Permalink Closed

    I see the piece as totally unrelated to the current problems at USM.

    __________________
    Robert Campbell

    Date:
    Permalink Closed

    Invictus,


    One of the holes I saw in the analysis was not talking about the USM Business graduates who leave the state.


    Many "economic impact" pitches for state universities and their programs ignore such considerations.


    Robert Campbell



    __________________
    Invictus

    Date:
    Permalink Closed

    quote:
    Originally posted by: Robert Campbell

    "One of the holes I saw in the analysis was not talking about the USM Business graduates who leave the state. Many "economic impact" pitches for state universities and their programs ignore such considerations."


    In my experience, most economists are quite familiar with the concept but few know how (or want) to do anything about it in their formulas.

    Quick man-on-the-street poll proposal: Ask people what word they associate with "economics." My bet is that half will say "home" & the other half will say "voodoo."

    [Really buzzin' on these cynicism pills!]

    __________________
    David Johnson

    Date:
    Permalink Closed

    quote:
    Originally posted by: Robert Campbell

    "Invictus,
    One of the holes I saw in the analysis was not talking about the USM Business graduates who leave the state.
    Many "economic impact" pitches for state universities and their programs ignore such considerations.
    Robert Campbell
    "


    And, to be totally accurate, you would also have to include salaries earned and taxes paid by graduates coming into the state from non-Mississippi insitutions. Of course, that would assume Mississippi were a 'destination.'

    __________________
    Fickle Fingers of our Fate

    Date:
    Permalink Closed

    What a capricious bunch we are!  Repeatedly posters on this website have jumped on the bandwagon sayiung education is the best investment the state can make in its citizens.  Then we get a credible source articulating that argument publicly for us and we jump all over it looking for flaws.  I, for one, choose simply to say thank you Dr. Gunther.

    __________________
    Butterfinger

    Date:
    Permalink Closed


    quote:





    Originally posted by: Fickle Fingers of our Fat


    Repeatedly posters on this website have jumped on the bandwagon sayiung education is the best investment the state can make in its citizens.  Then we get a credible source articulating that argument publicly for us and we jump all over it looking for flaws.  I, for one, choose simply to say thank you Dr. Gunther."




    I second your remarks, Fickle Finger.

    __________________
    The Shadow

    Date:
    Permalink Closed

    quote:
    Originally posted by: Fickle Fingers of our Fate

    "What a capricious bunch we are!  Repeatedly posters on this website have jumped on the bandwagon sayiung education is the best investment the state can make in its citizens.  Then we get a credible source articulating that argument publicly for us and we jump all over it looking for flaws.  I, for one, choose simply to say thank you Dr. Gunther."


    I think people were hoping that it might at least touch on the current situation at USM. Also, the more common economic development argument is that an educated workforce attracts business to a state. As it is now, many educated young people must leave Mississippi because the state is perceived by businesses as having a poorly educated population.

    __________________
    Theorem

    Date:
    Permalink Closed

    quote:

    Originally posted by: The Shadow

    "an educated workforce attracts business to a state"

    A collorary to that principle: an uneducated workforce attracts minimum-wage sweatshops to the state.

    __________________
    Invictus

    Date:
    Permalink Closed

    quote:
    Originally posted by: Theorem

    "A collorary to that principle: an uneducated workforce attracts minimum-wage sweatshops to the state."


    This happens to be the prevailing economic development practice in the state. No, it's not what the economic developmentators say but it is essentially what they & the legislature do.

    Third world class is what it is.

    __________________
    Curmudgeon

    Date:
    Permalink Closed

    quote:
    Originally posted by: Theorem

    "A collorary to that principle: an uneducated workforce attracts minimum-wage sweatshops to the state."


    That worked until industry discovered China.

    __________________
    Page 1 of 1  sorted by
     
    Quick Reply

    Please log in to post quick replies.

    Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


    Create your own FREE Forum
    Report Abuse
    Powered by ActiveBoard