As there has been much discussion about USM's online ED degree, I thought readers of the message board would fine this recent article from Salon Magazine interesting. I'm interested in what people think about it.
I'm new to these commands, so forgive me if I don't do the hotlink command correctly
Salon Magazine From ivory tower to academic sweatshop After a few dot-com-era bumps, online education is back and bigger than ever. But so is corporate influence and bottom-line pressure.
A couple of observations come to mind. If you do it right (lots of faculty/student interaction), online education is expensive and time consuming. Talking to 50 students at once in a traditional classroom is actually pretty efficient.
Online education probably doesn't produce a lot of "eureka moments."
The kid who goes to Milsaps is getting something that Phoenix University will never deliver.
Shadow, you do have a point. While I am an advocate of distance education, I've never thought distance ed should be more than a way to extend and supplement, particularly for people who just can't meet certain classes. I haven't read the article, but to me an online course is sort of like the green veggie with your meal; while they can be great, you couldn't eat green beans three times a day. (And I agree about the "eureka" moments -- my reward has always been those students who come up at the end of the semester and say "I never liked writing before . . .")
Actually, I think online classes are like a dessert...you shouldn't eat too much of it, you should only have it in conjunction with a healthy meal (in-class classes), and if you do eat too much of it, you'll get sick or fat or have rotten teeth, all of which are not good.