I just heard on the radio that the Board of Regents of Baylor University has sacked the president. He had survived a Faculty Senate vote of no confidence in September, 2003 (26-6) when the regents voted 31-4 to keep him as president. He survived a second vote of no confidence in May 2004 (32-1) when the regents voted 18-17 to keep him in charge. I got these numbers from a Google search. I haven't found the details of today's action. It sounds a bit like Clyda Rent and the IHL.
Hey, at least their Board of Regents voted...was there ever such a public vote on SFT from the IHL?
Plus, isn't Baylor a private univ.? From what I've learned working at Vandy, public and private universities are about as much alike as apples and oranges in that respect.
I found a bit more info. It was reported that he "stepped down" today effective in May. He will assume the position of chancellor which reports to the president and which engages in fund raising and other off campus activities. The regents are expected to endorse the change this month. It appears that, technically, he was not sacked. The Baylor faculty voted no confidence in December with an 85% no confidence vote.
quote: Originally posted by: Curmudgeon "The Baylor faculty voted no confidence in December with an 85% no confidence vote."
I have observed that votes of no confidence usually forecase the demise of presidents at good universities. Not long ago there was Auburn. Today there is Baylor. Those are only two examples of recent vintage. Sometimes the no-confidence vote is taken more than once before the institution's governing board pays sufficient attention. Good governing boards recognize that a university can not be properly run when faculty confidence has eroded to such an overwhelming level.
It took them nearly ten years to get rid of him and it included the wrath of the regents over a $2,000,000 airplane he purchased. When they came down on him he sold it and purchased a $1,000,000 airplane. The exhausted Baylor AAUP members are celebrating today! They have been in the trenches fighting tooth and nail!
quote: Originally posted by: ram " Oh, Lord. Ten years. What if . . .? To answer Truth's question: yes, Baylor is a Southern Baptist school. The Texas equivalent of Mississippi College in some respects. "
Yes, but the first no confidence vote was in September, 2003.
quote: Originally posted by: Con Man "I have observed that votes of no confidence usually forecase the demise of presidents at good universities. Not long ago there was Auburn. Today there is Baylor. Those are only two examples of recent vintage. Sometimes the no-confidence vote is taken more than once before the institution's governing board pays sufficient attention. Good governing boards recognize that a university can not be properly run when faculty confidence has eroded to such an overwhelming level. "
both auburn and baylor had problems in athletics....so there maybe a common thread for university presidents job security and issues with the athletic dept
Please, not a decade, there won't be many of us here with any kind of AAUP or institutional memory to remember why anyone would even dance...please, let us not deprive ourselves of that victory dance...why not take another vote? Where is our spirit to "take to the Dome" for another rally? Do we really have to wait for our "defining event", such as another unjust, catastrophic firing or worse, dissolution of the Senate, etc.? Why are we waiting? As Frank would say, will there be anybody left, when security comes to our office door with chains and a padlock???