Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Klumb's a genius
Visiting Bulldog

Date:
Klumb's a genius
Permalink Closed


Klumb will keep insisting that all is well--up until the very moment that he's forced by outside agencies to admit that it's not. Remember the NCAA/MSU debacle from the fall? A brief reminder runs below, which is a good read even if you don't care at all about sports.


http://www.clarionledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041022/SPORTS030102/410220343/1079

October 22, 2004


MSU passes review with flying colors

State College Board committee finds MSU athletics in compliance

By Ian R. Rapoport
irapopor@clarionledger.com

STARKVILLE — The athletic program at Mississippi State has "appropriate policies and procedures," according to a review of its operations by the state College Board's Intercollegiate Athletics Committee that was approved on Thursday.

On the seven different categories reviewed, Mississippi State was found to have complied with six. The status of one category — the role of athletics personnel in MSU's on-going NCAA football infractions case — awaits final word from the completion of the NCAA's investigation.

"We are pleased that the board's review of the Mississippi State athletic program has been completed," said MSU president Charles Lee. "We are committed to maintaining a sound, responsible athletic program."

..."The board has a responsibility to oversee operations and to address concerns within the scope of our authority," Klumb said.

Lee agreed, saying, "We respect the responsibility of the board to be well-informed on topics such as those addressed in this report."

After six months of discussions and debates and controversy that eventually resulted in a report that stated everything at Mississippi State is fine, Klumb is ready to put it behind him.

"I'm satisfied," he said. "It's time to move on."

*****************************************************

http://www2.ncaa.org/media_and_events/press_room/2004/october/20041027_miss_st_infr.html

Mississippi State Penalized for Violations in Football

For Immediate Release

Wednesday, October 27, 2004

Contact

Erik Christianson
Director of Public and Media Relations

317/917-6117

INDIANAPOLIS—The NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions has placed Mississippi State University on probation for four years and instituted several other penalties for numerous violations in the institution's football program.

These violations centered on recruiting infractions by two former assistant football coaches and several representatives of the university's athletics interests (boosters) and included unethical conduct charges against the two former assistant football coaches.  Allegations that the former head football coach violated NCAA unethical conduct bylaws and provided a "substantial recruiting inducement" to a prospect were not found by the committee.

Other penalties imposed by the Committee on Infractions in this case include a ban on postseason play for the 2004 season and reductions in scholarships and official visits.  The university is considered a "repeat violator" under NCAA bylaws because the infractions occurred within five years of the starting date for penalties in a 1996 major infractions case involving the football program.

__________________
Robert Campbell

Date:
Permalink Closed

Visiting Bulldog,


Some people who don't understand the consequences of the Board's refusal to take SACS seriously may get the point about not taking the NCAA seriously.


Thank you for posting this material.


Robert Campbell



__________________
Athletically Challenged

Date:
Permalink Closed

I don't understand.

__________________
Visiting Bulldog

Date:
Permalink Closed

The Board has a poor track record when it comes to listening to the objections lodged by external reviewers. There was this April gem from Scott Ross, Klumb's tag-team partner on the Board and, astonishingly, the Board's chair of the Intercollegiate Athletics Committee.


http://www.clarionledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040417/SPORTS030102/404170366/1079

April 17, 2004

MSU disputes NCAA allegations

School's response says facts don't back up 12 major charges

By Rusty Hampton
rhampton@clarionledger.com


Mississippi State University disputes all but one of 13 major allegations of rules violations the NCAA lodged last December against its football program, according to a report the school released Friday.

In a 188-page response to the NCAA's Notice of Allegations, State admits to 10 violations that it terms "secondary" and one potentially major violation — that recruits Tommy Kelly and Demetric Wright were allowed to stay for free at a Starkville hotel for 12 days during January 2001.

The school disputes the NCAA's claims that former coach Jackie Sherrill and assistants Jerry Fremin and Glenn Davis engaged in unethical conduct by making improper recruiting contacts or inducements to prospects and their families.

"We do not find factual information that backs up the major allegations that were made," MSU athletic director Larry Templeton said.

State College Board member Scott Ross of West Point said he's not surprised that State disputes the major allegations.

"I'd dispute it all, too, if I was their attorney," Ross said. "I don't trust the NCAA for a second. They have no recognized standards. They should be required to approve things by the same standards of a court of law."

......


__________________
Wildlife & Fisheries Biologist

Date:
Permalink Closed

I for one am glad that Roy Klumb is on the IHL Board instead of the Game & Fish Commission.

College accreditation is one thing. It upsets a small fraction of the less than 17% of Mississippians who have college degrees & attended USM. Getting a sanction from USF&WS that suspended deer season would be another thing entirely ... and the upset people would all be armed with high-powered rifles.


__________________
Justice for one but not for all

Date:
Permalink Closed

Ross is quoted as saying "I don't trust the NCAA for a second. They have no recognized standards. They should be required to approve things by the same standards of a court of law."


So Mr. Ross is a member of the IHL, huh? He likes things approved by the same standards of a court of law, huh? Then why in the name of blazes didn't he and the IHL demand such proof when those unsutstantiated allegations were lodged against your two tenured faculty members last Spring?



__________________
Invictus

Date:
Permalink Closed

quote:
Originally posted by: Justice for one but not for all

"So Mr. Ross is a member of the IHL, huh? He likes things approved by the same standards of a court of law, huh? Then why in the name of blazes didn't he and the IHL demand such proof when those unsutstantiated allegations were lodged against your two tenured faculty members last Spring? "


Um, because it wasn't happening at Mississippi State University, most likely. And it didn't involve sports.



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard