Klumb will keep insisting that all is well--up until the very moment that he's forced by outside agencies to admit that it's not. Remember the NCAA/MSU debacle from the fall? A brief reminder runs below, which is a good read even if you don't care at all about sports.
State College Board committee finds MSU athletics in compliance
By Ian R. Rapoport irapopor@clarionledger.com
STARKVILLE — The athletic program at Mississippi State has "appropriate policies and procedures," according to a review of its operations by the state College Board's Intercollegiate Athletics Committee that was approved on Thursday.
On the seven different categories reviewed, Mississippi State was found to have complied with six. The status of one category — the role of athletics personnel in MSU's on-going NCAA football infractions case — awaits final word from the completion of the NCAA's investigation.
"We are pleased that the board's review of the Mississippi State athletic program has been completed," said MSU president Charles Lee. "We are committed to maintaining a sound, responsible athletic program."
..."The board has a responsibility to oversee operations and to address concerns within the scope of our authority," Klumb said.
Lee agreed, saying, "We respect the responsibility of the board to be well-informed on topics such as those addressed in this report."
After six months of discussions and debates and controversy that eventually resulted in a report that stated everything at Mississippi State is fine, Klumb is ready to put it behind him.
Mississippi State Penalized for Violations in Football
For Immediate Release
Wednesday, October 27, 2004
Contact
Erik Christianson Director of Public and Media Relations
317/917-6117
INDIANAPOLIS—The NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions has placed Mississippi State University on probation for four years and instituted several other penalties for numerous violations in the institution's football program.
These violations centered on recruiting infractions by two former assistant football coaches and several representatives of the university's athletics interests (boosters) and included unethical conduct charges against the two former assistant football coaches. Allegations that the former head football coach violated NCAA unethical conduct bylaws and provided a "substantial recruiting inducement" to a prospect were not found by the committee.
Other penalties imposed by the Committee on Infractions in this case include a ban on postseason play for the 2004 season and reductions in scholarships and official visits. The university is considered a "repeat violator" under NCAA bylaws because the infractions occurred within five years of the starting date for penalties in a 1996 major infractions case involving the football program.
The Board has a poor track record when it comes to listening to the objections lodged by external reviewers. There was this April gem from Scott Ross, Klumb's tag-team partner on the Board and, astonishingly, the Board's chair of the Intercollegiate Athletics Committee.
School's response says facts don't back up 12 major charges
By Rusty Hampton rhampton@clarionledger.com
Mississippi State University disputes all but one of 13 major allegations of rules violations the NCAA lodged last December against its football program, according to a report the school released Friday.
In a 188-page response to the NCAA's Notice of Allegations, State admits to 10 violations that it terms "secondary" and one potentially major violation — that recruits Tommy Kelly and Demetric Wright were allowed to stay for free at a Starkville hotel for 12 days during January 2001.
The school disputes the NCAA's claims that former coach Jackie Sherrill and assistants Jerry Fremin and Glenn Davis engaged in unethical conduct by making improper recruiting contacts or inducements to prospects and their families.
"We do not find factual information that backs up the major allegations that were made," MSU athletic director Larry Templeton said.
State College Board member Scott Ross of West Point said he's not surprised that State disputes the major allegations.
"I'd dispute it all, too, if I was their attorney," Ross said. "I don't trust the NCAA for a second. They have no recognized standards. They should be required to approve things by the same standards of a court of law."
I for one am glad that Roy Klumb is on the IHL Board instead of the Game & Fish Commission.
College accreditation is one thing. It upsets a small fraction of the less than 17% of Mississippians who have college degrees & attended USM. Getting a sanction from USF&WS that suspended deer season would be another thing entirely ... and the upset people would all be armed with high-powered rifles.
Ross is quoted as saying "I don't trust the NCAA for a second. They have no recognized standards. They should be required to approve things by the same standards of a court of law."
So Mr. Ross is a member of the IHL, huh? He likes things approved by the same standards of a court of law, huh? Then why in the name of blazes didn't he and the IHL demand such proof when those unsutstantiated allegations were lodged against your two tenured faculty members last Spring?
quote: Originally posted by: Justice for one but not for all "So Mr. Ross is a member of the IHL, huh? He likes things approved by the same standards of a court of law, huh? Then why in the name of blazes didn't he and the IHL demand such proof when those unsutstantiated allegations were lodged against your two tenured faculty members last Spring? "
Um, because it wasn't happening at Mississippi State University, most likely. And it didn't involve sports.