Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: USM Foundation supports Mississippi Children's Home
ram


Status: Offline
Posts: 80
Date:
USM Foundation supports Mississippi Children's Home
Permalink Closed


Potential participants have received invitations to a Wine Tasting and Silent Auction that will be held on May 4 at the Canebrake Golf Club, the proceeds of which will benefit the Mississippi Children's Home Services.  One of the "Aficianado Sponsors" is listed as "President and Mrs. Shelby F. Thames and the USM Foundation."  I should probably just feel all warm and fuzzy because the President, his spouse and the USM Foundation are all doing good stuff for a worthy charity.  Kudos and props to SFT and the Missus; but the inclusion of the Foundation as a sponsor gives me pause.

As an occasional donor to the USM Foundation, it bothers me a bit to think that the funds I contribute are going to the Children's Home.  Not that the Home is in any way unworthy of support, but if I wanted my money to go there, I'd make my own dang contribution.  I give to the USM Foundation with the assumption that it will benefit students, faculty, staff -- somebody-- at USM.  Silly me.

Maybe the sponsorship of the Wine Tasting and Silent Auction is from a particular fund that was established to promote the USM Foundation by demonstrating what a good corporate citizen it is.  In the alternative, perhaps this particular contribution was made from money that is assessed as "administrative expense" and charged against the endowed funds and scholarship money that make up most of the Foundation assets.  If so, I think it could have been better described.  To be frank, the actual description included on the invitation gives me the impression that the President uses the Foundation as his own personal charitable checkbook.

I can only hope that the next president will be -- if nothing else -- more conscious of the appearance of possible impropriety.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink Closed

At this point in time, it behooves the Foundation to avoid anything that could possibly look funny.   Donors are thinking about coming back on board.

There was a time in the past when one of the departments in the former College of the Arts was listed as a donor on NPR.   I know those folks--and know it was for name recognition--but I always thought it didn't look quite right for the department/college to be asking for donors but itself be a donor.


__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 137
Date:
Permalink Closed

I fully support the MS Children's Hospital.

The Foundation has enough problems in their own house that need to be taken care of. 

How do current Foundation donors and possible future donors feel about this?

__________________
Southern Belle at Southern Miss
LVN


Status: Offline
Posts: 408
Date:
Permalink Closed

As a person who has donated to other schools, I always assumed that my money would be used on campus. While I too strongly support MS Children's Home, I don't understand how the Foundation picks which "worthy cause" to support. If they have this freedom, what's to keep them from picking something many donors would strongly oppose next time? It's the precedent that's worrisome.

__________________
Love your enemies.  It makes them so damned mad.  ~P.D. East


Status: Offline
Posts: 146
Date:
Permalink Closed

Could it be the funds are just donations from the members of the department or unit?  I know that on occasion our department would collect donations from faculty and staff to make a contribution for some cause.  The donation was said to be from the department of __________. 

__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink Closed

I work in non-profit.  Many times we have donors that are involved with our organization that make gifts on our behalf to other non-profits, and we get the "public" acknowlegement or PR associated with the gift.  It's like free advertisement for us b/c we have no budget for paid placement in the papers or glossies.  Not a check is cut nor disbursed from the 501(c)3 coffers.  And the original donor still gets the tax deduction associated with the gift, as they have no care to be publicly acknowledged or recognized. 

Anonymity is gold when it comes to major philanthropy.



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard