We haven't gotten much response to our ad campaign. We are still very interested in getting our program onto your campus. We have run the latest press release through our package, and can tell you what Lisa Mader was thinking when she put it together. Here goes (using the same approach/format as last time):
Southern Miss Faculty and Staff Get Raises
Faculty and staff will be receiving raises at The University of Southern Mississippi for the 2005 fiscal year because of increased revenue and conservative fiscal management [Thank you, Dr. Thames, for bringing me here to work under you].
The Legislature did not provide sufficient money for across-the-board increases for the fiscal year that began July 1, 2004. The state College Board said university presidents could give raises if they found the money. "Over the last two years we've worked very had to be more efficient with university funds so that we could use our savings to invest in our most important asset - our people," said university President Shelby Thames. "We've made this money by the way we've managed this university."
[I wish he would have let me go with my original statement that USM wouldn't be here today without his polymer research center, which really provided the raises faculty are getting. Those ungrateful bastards]
More than $2.5 million will be allocated to faculty and staff based on merit. An additional $800,000 will be allocated across-the-board to all faculty and staff. With the additional $320,000 distributed to 10 percent of the faculty at midyear, Southern Miss faculty and staff are receiving pay increases totaling more than $3.6 million for the year.
Consideration for raise distribution was given to a number of variables including teaching, research, service, quality of work, quantity of work, credit hours produced, etc. "This has been a lengthy process that was given much consideration and involved input from every level of faculty and staff," said Rex Gandy, dean of the College of Science and Technology. "I had many conversations with my chairs, the other deans, faculty in my college and members of the Faculty Senate.
[Gandy better recognize. He only has Dr. Thames' ear if I say so. I could just hang up on him when he calls like I used to do Tim]
There is always room for improvement, but I believe we did a really outstanding job with this process. We moved slowly, thoughtfully and methodically, and I hope our faculty and staff will be pleased with the outcome."
[What's this "We" stuff? Dr. Thames came up with all this]
"First let me say that we are, hallelujah, getting a raise," said Faculty Senate President Dr. David Beckett. "That's a momentous step."
[Beckett may be more useful to us than I first thought. This is great stuff, and I don't even have to 'doctor it' any. Stick a mic in his mug everyday I say]
During raise discussions Faculty Senate officers met with Dr. Thames, Chief Financial Officer Gregg Lassen, deans and the president's cabinet multiple times to present their ideas for the distribution of the salary increases. Faculty Senate officers proposed that all faculty and staff get a raise because it has been several years since legislative allocations for salary increases were specified for university employees.
"Because Dr. Beckett and the Faculty Senate officers made their point persuasively, I asked Mr. Lassen and our budget office personnel to take an additional $800,000 and allocate $400 per faculty and staff member in addition to their merit-based raises," said Dr. Thames. "I appreciate the approach they took and am pleased that we could work together to reward our personnel."
["Lisa Slay Thames" --- gosh that sounds soooooooo gooooooooooooood.......]
"The administration listened to us seriously and took our suggestions to heart," said Beckett. "I am pleased that every member of the faculty and staff are receiving supplementary $400 raises, which will help as a cost of living adjustment for those who have not gotten raises for some time. This approach helps those who need it most."
All faculty and staff received two percent across-the-board raises in 2002. Additionally, sixty-seven faculty members shared $320,000 in midyear merit-based raises in December.
[Mine sure was good. What was it, 15, 16 percent? I can't remember, but who's counting?]
These raises will be retroactive to July 1, 2004, for 12-month employees and for nine-month employees will begin with their first paychecks of the fall semester. Employees hired after January 15, 2004, were not eligible for raises.
[I wonder who's goin' to 'the Hog' tonight? I can call Angie from my cell]
"I do not expect the Legislature to be able to allocate money for raises next year or the next," said Dr. Thames. "I do believe though, that we can still give raises again next year if we work together to recruit more students, retain more of our current students, generate more credit hours and spend our assets wisely."
[These darn faculty better 'take care' of the 099s. We can always just change grades behind their backs to keep up enrollments. That's worked before]
Brilliant as before, WT. However, I've not heard any comment on this board about a little manuever quietly being done -- as people leave, some jobs are being downgraded, so that the replacement comes in at a lower level. Now that's an "efficient" way to save money. I can't tell you the specific instances I know about, but it does matter when a grade 12 job becomes a grade 10, or lower. And you sometimes luck up and get a good young person trying to get their foot in the door, but sometimes you just get what you pay for.
quote: Originally posted by: LVN "However, I've not heard any comment on this board about a little manuever quietly being done -- as people leave, some jobs are being downgraded, so that the replacement comes in at a lower level. Now that's an "efficient" way to save money."
Isn't that what's been going on for the past 3-4 years (two of Fleming, two of SFT)? Tenured and 'senior' faculty leave, to be replaced by Assistant Professors, Lecturers, and 'part-time' Instructors. Just look at the English department and the oh-so-embarassing newspaper ad, seeking ENG 101 'teachers.'
quote: Originally posted by: under the radar " Isn't that what's been going on for the past 3-4 years (two of Fleming, two of SFT)? Tenured and 'senior' faculty leave, to be replaced by Assistant Professors, Lecturers, and 'part-time' Instructors. Just look at the English department and the oh-so-embarassing newspaper ad, seeking ENG 101 'teachers.'
"
I was actually thinking more of staff positions, but of course you have a point. However, this will be a good place to say something. The people coming in this fall as adjuncts do not presume to "replace" the departing faculty like Dr. Stringer. However, they are as well qualified or more so, as TA's, and they are doing the work for a truly pathetic salary. Instead of this snobbery, how about some appreciation that anybody loves teaching enough to come over there and try to help in a bad situation. It's not the world we would like to see, it's the world we've got.