Independent online - USM Forum -- Message Board

Date: Feb 10, 2006

Independent online

Date: Feb 10, 2006

I know Kim Castle slightly, have no opinions on the case so far. However, I wonder how her name got leaked to the American, and why they printed it when the indictment wasn't even public?? That's scary.

Date: Feb 11, 2006

This is a big story about to break wide open. Alot of people backed by the university community are about to be indicted. Mostly liberals who have milked the poverty game.

Date: Feb 11, 2006

Just the conspiracy theorist in me, but Ray Price's eagerness to go on the record in response to a second-string newspaper article citing "sources who wish to remain anonymous" while disclosing the nature of a yet-unreleased federal indictment just sounds too convenient.

Wasn't Price the guy who so skillfully handled Stephanie Stevens' defense?

Date: Feb 11, 2006

It was in the HA first, then Price issued a statement.

Date: Feb 11, 2006

The other shoe wrote:

Alot of people backed by the university community are about to be indicted. Mostly liberals who have milked the poverty game.

And how do you know this?

Date: Feb 17, 2006

LVN wrote:

The other shoe wrote:
Alot of people backed by the university community are about to be indicted. Mostly liberals who have milked the poverty game.

And how do you know this?

It's in the public domain now. Some of the kingpins of the poverty,racism,victimization scam are being held to account.

Date: Feb 17, 2006

The other shoe wrote:

LVN wrote: The other shoe wrote: Alot of people backed by the university community are about to be indicted. Mostly liberals who have milked the poverty game.

And how do you know this?

It's in the public domain now. Some of the kingpins of the poverty,racism,victimization scam are being held to account.

Oh, thanks for the clear and precise explanation, Other Shoe. It's information like yours that really helps us understand.

Date: Feb 17, 2006

See the Independent's 2/16/06 update for USM and ADP connections.

http://www.onlineindependent.net/news.html

Date: Feb 17, 2006

The other shoe wrote:

This is a big story about to break wide open. Alot of people backed by the university community are about to be indicted. Mostly liberals who have milked the poverty game.

OK - I'll be stupid and bite here: What the H*LL does this have to do about any supposed "liberals"? After reading the descriptions of the accused, I don't get what you are suggesting? Could you be clear? Example: I am a liberal, leftist, humanist and I do not have anything to do with this nor do I even understand what it is about other than basic fraud, and if you are saying fraud is restricted to so-called "liberals" then you need to get out from under your shell more often.

Date: Feb 17, 2006

I'll be stupid too. What is the "connection" to USM, other than that some of the defendants are students and one is a food service employee (and that would actually be Aramark, right?)

I'm with Angeline on this - - - sin doesn't confine itself to one party or one political outlook.

Date: Feb 17, 2006

Il n'yapas de fume'e sans feu.

Date: Feb 23, 2006

The indictments are flowing like red wine at high class wedding! Every local member of the poverty game is running scared. They've got the preacher's boy and they're just beginning. It may reach high into the city administration. Don't go away.

Date: Feb 23, 2006

Red wine at a wedding? I think not, mon ami. That is why le bon dieu made Dom Perignon.

Mais non, you do not seem to me like a "high class" person with your so smug attitude. The real crime will be revealed -- you do not need to add ugliness about people's children to this most terrible situation. I know one of the parents, and she is suffering greatly. We believe in justice, but it is not to laugh.

Date: Feb 23, 2006

But I thought Ripple was a "red wine." (I tend to distrust libations that don't come with a screw top.

)

Date: Feb 24, 2006

Angeline wrote:

....I am a liberal, leftist...

No kidding? I'd never have guessed that in a million years. Happy to have you on board.

Date: Feb 24, 2006

Monique de Guerre wrote:

Red wine at a wedding? I think not, mon ami. That is why le bon dieu made Dom Perignon.

Mais non, you do not seem to me like a "high class" person with your so smug attitude. The real crime will be revealed -- you do not need to add ugliness about people's children to this most terrible situation. I know one of the parents, and she is suffering greatly. We believe in justice, but it is not to laugh.

Comme on fait son lit ,on se couche.

Date: Feb 24, 2006

True, F. Pierre. We all lie in the beds we have made, but one can still feel for the families. My heart would be broken if a child of mine hurt people this way.