Angie who? - USM Forum -- Message Board

Date: Jan 6, 2006

Angie who?

Date: Jan 6, 2006

What's in a name? wrote:

Just saw Herself on the news. Suddenly she's "Angie Godwin Dvorak" -- no problem with anybody using any name they want to, just struck by the "Godwin" part. Any connection with "Godwin Group" ?

It is GOD WIN

Date: Jan 6, 2006

prophet A wrote:

It is GOD WIN

As is, she lose?

Date: Jan 7, 2006

What's in a name? wrote:

Just saw Herself on the news. Suddenly she's "Angie Godwin Dvorak" -- no problem with anybody using any name they want to, just struck by the "Godwin" part. Any connection with "Godwin Group" ?

No connection. The topic was explored on the old Fire Shelby board.

Date: Jan 7, 2006

I saw the WDAM news story and heard Nick Ortego refer to AGD as "Godwin-Dvorak." My guess is she is transitioning toward dropping "Dvorak." From the looks of photos of her in the latest ADP spread in the HA as well as in the aforementioned WDAM news story, she is sporting a new hair color (reddish).

Date: Jan 7, 2006

Many in my demographic change names and hair color; I like the red -- it'll make her easier to spot in a crowd and avoid.

Date: Jan 7, 2006

If she wants to return to higher education, this probably is a smart move.

Date: Jan 7, 2006

What is a smart move? Changing her name or the new 'do? Or both?

Date: Jan 7, 2006

Angie needs more than a new name or 'do - she needs to realize that the little people of USM and Hattiesburg are onto her. SFT is a goober who is no judge of character obviously.

Date: Jan 9, 2006

The rumor mill has it that Angie babie has had a make over....head to toe including hypen. New woman, new year. Sure

Date: Jan 9, 2006

Rolling Stone wrote:

Angie needs more than a new name or 'do - she needs to realize that the little people of USM and Hattiesburg are onto her. SFT is a goober who is no judge of character obviously.

This board is a judge of character of the infantilism of USM profs. No one in Hattiesburg gives a righteous **** about your little war on Thames, Dvorak or anyone else for that matter, only that you're a large embarassment upon the local community with your childish invective that only serves to further devalue the university. You "adults" need to realize this before you keep prattling on and make your degrees worth even less than you've already made them to be.

Oh, and if you don't like my comments, tough. It's a public board, not an exclusive "Bash Shelby" party, and I'll stick my comments wherever I please. You're welcome.

Yes Quarter

Date: Jan 9, 2006

Trollicus wrote:

Rolling Stone wrote: Angie needs more than a new name or 'do - she needs to realize that the little people of USM and Hattiesburg are onto her. SFT is a goober who is no judge of character obviously. This board is a judge of character of the infantilism of USM profs. No one in Hattiesburg gives a righteous damn about your little war on Thames, Dvorak or anyone else for that matter, only that you're a large embarassment upon the local community with your childish invective that only serves to further devalue the university. You "adults" need to realize this before you keep prattling on and make your degrees worth even less than you've already made them to be. Oh, and if you don't like my comments, tough. It's a public board, not an exclusive "Bash Shelby" piss party, and I'll stick my comments wherever I damn well please. You're welcome. Yes Quarter

At least your name tells everyone that you ARE a Troll.

Date: Jan 9, 2006

Trollicus wrote:

No one in Hattiesburg gives a righteous damn about your little war

Tell somebody that cares. At this point, it's gone far beyond that.

Date: Jan 10, 2006

There are some things that inquiring minds don't want to know. People's feet are on the list. The kids have a saying "that's too much information" -- please spare us.

Date: Jan 12, 2006

Many people have real issues with Dr. Dvorak's actions. May we keep the discussion focused on those?

Besides, who cares what color somebody's hair is?

Date: Jan 22, 2006

Looks like the webmaster deleted some posts on this thread -- thanks!

Date: Jan 25, 2006

LVN said days ago "who cares about hair color." She is right. She also stated real issues. Check deeper into ther background.

Date: Jan 25, 2006

Radical, who do you think is going to "check deeper" and what do you suggest they do with the information? You've bumped up three old threads on this topic, to no purpose.

Date: Jan 25, 2006

I did notice that Dr. Dvorak no longer lists herself as a tenured faculty member anywhere--let alone the University of Kentucky. Yes, this is a different kind of bio, but a tenured professorship at UK is pretigious enough that most would list it were it accurate.

Date: Jan 25, 2006

Gone, gone, gone wrote:

but a tenured professorship . . . . is pretigious enough that most would list it were it accurate.

Some people might list it even if were not true

Date: Feb 2, 2006

Fashion Watcher wrote:

Just spotted Dr. Dr. Angie in a local bistro, . . ..

Dang, it's 7:30 AM. What are either one of you doing in a "bistro" at this hour.

Date: Feb 2, 2006

"Before" hours club wrote:

Fashion Watcher wrote: Just spotted Dr. Dr. Angie in a local bistro,

. . .. Dang, it's 7:30 AM. What are either one of you doing in a "bistro" at this hour.

Perhaps you're unaware that the now single Angie's theme song is "All Night Long"?

Date: Feb 7, 2006

To the top!

Date: Feb 8, 2006

If you think this wild! Check out her credentials in Alabama! How did she get where she is at and what criteria di she use?

Date: Feb 8, 2006

Dry Humor wrote:

If you think this wild! Check out her credentials in Alabama! How did she get where she is at and what criteria di she use?

You keep posting this. Where is this information?

Date: Feb 8, 2006

And what will we do with this information? If I had a dossier a foot thick on Dr. D, what would I do about any of it? She's obviously well-protected, probably has the goods on somebody.

To whoever keeps bumping up these threads: be patient. People like that usually end up being the agent of their own destruction. Reap what they sow, and all that.

I'm old, I've seen it.

Date: Feb 8, 2006

Little old lady wrote:

And what will we do with this information? If I had a dossier a foot thick on Dr. D, what would I do about any of it? She's obviously well-protected, probably has the goods on somebody.

To whoever keeps bumping up these threads: be patient. People like that usually end up being the agent of their own destruction. Reap what they sow, and all that.

I'm old, I've seen it.

Exactly. It's pretty clear that there was a substantial dossier on her two years ago, and what happened? Well, at least we got rid of her, but the city didn't. I agree. She is well protected. It would be interesting to know why and how, and I figure that someday we will.

Another old lady, not to be confused with the one and only original

Date: Feb 9, 2006

The faster you dig the more you will know. But at our age who would listen. She is well protected but her mouth is too big!

Date: Feb 9, 2006

Little old lady wrote:

To whoever keeps bumping up these threads: be patient. People like that usually end up being the agent of their own destruction. Reap what they sow, and all that.

Date: Feb 9, 2006

You reap and I will sow! BUt the Big Pig is on the run.