One of the missions of this center appears to be helping college students become literate. This is a bunch of baloney.Any student who can't read and write adequately should not be admitted. I think this is why colleges and professors are held in low regard. I do realize that the policies that allow unprepared students to enroll are set by the administration,not the faculty.
STATEMENT OF SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN ON THE CONFERENCE REPORT FOR H.R. 3064 The District Of Columbia, The Departments Of Labor, Health And Human Services, And Education Appropriations Bill For The Fiscal Year 2000 For Immediate Release Tuesday, Nov 02, 1999
Mr. President, I regret that I was unable to be here for the vote but I want to thank the conferees for their hard work on the conference report that provides federal funding for the District of Columbia, the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services (HHS), and Education. I am very disappointed that this report includes wasteful, locality-specific, pork-barrel projects, legislative riders, and budget gimmicks such as "forward funding" and a 1-percent cut in government spending across-the-board. Therefore, I cannot support this bill.
...Earmark of $1,000,000 for the Center for Literacy and Assessment at the University of Southern Mississippi....
[Congressional Record: November 19, 1999 (Senate)] [Page S14986-S15059] From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:cr19no99pt2-163]
... Mr. GRAMS. ... Instead of streamlining federal spending, we have thrown in more money to please big spenders without the needed analysis to ensure the spending will help us solve problems. Like last year's bill, this bill looks like a Christmas tree full of pork projects. Many are added in the last minute negotiation. But we don't know exactly what they are and how much they cost, because again we have not been given enough time to review this bill. Here are a few examples as identified by Senator McCain:
An entirely new title is included in the legislation during last minute negotiations, the ``Mississippi National Forest Improvement Act of 1999,'' which had not previously been considered in the previous Senate or House bills. A half million dollars is added for the Salt Lake City Olympic tree program. It earmarked $2 million for the University of Mississippi Center for Sustainable Health Outreach and $3 million for the Center for Environmental Medicine and Toxicology at the University of Mississippi Medical Center at Jackson. An earmark of $3 million is added for the Wheeling National Heritage Area and $3 million for the Lincoln Library. It earmarked $2 million for Tupelo School District in Mississippi for technology innovation. It includes an earmark of $3 million for the Southwest Pennsylvania Heritage Area. It also earmarked $1 million for the completion of the Easter Seal Society's Early Childhood Development Project for the Mississippi River Delta Region and $1 million for the Center for Literacy and Assessment at the University of Southern Mississippi. It also includes an increase of $3.6 million for Washington State Hatchery Improvement....
$1 million for the Center for Literacy and Assessment at the University of Southern Mississippi.
"My biggest fear, Mr. President, is this omnibus spending legislation may allow Congress and the President to spend some of the Social Security surplus by not imposing an adequate across-the-board spending reduction."
Is McCain referring to the Social Security surplus to which I have contributed? Not with mine, you don't.
Note the comment by Mr. Grams: ". . this bill looks like a Christmas tree full of pork projects. Many are added in the last minute negotiation. But we don't know exactly what they are and how much they cost, because again we have not been given enough time to review this bill. Here are a few examples as identified by Senator McCain . . "
Who the heck was influential enough to push this bill through?
Senators from Mississippi usually do these dirty deeds. At the last Faculty Senate meeting SFT said a Senator would get $20 million for USM's Innovation and Commercialization Park (Old Van Hook Golf Course).
The major player in this "Center"'s grab at the money was Thad Cochran (with some help from Trent Lott) - go walk the hall sometime when it's in "session". The absence of activity is startling.
However, from this Board I heard that Dana's Solitaire skills are becoming well-honed - that might have been when I googled her name and Robert Campbell's June 15 blog pulled up in Libery & Power.
You are wrong in your assumptions.....our strengh is to serve grade school children and help them become academically stronger.....before one makes an assumption.....one must see for themselves the true workings of the center....you know what they say....assumption is the mother of..........
The research link on the center's website is embarrassing. First, there is no original research listed. Second, the research of other's that is listed is a hodgepodge of references that are mostly dated. In no way does that link provide a viewer with any evidence that the center is producing research and it certainly does not provide the viewer with information related to cutting edge research in the area of literacy.
I spend a lot of time partnering with local schools (e.g., Forrest County, Petal) and can tell you that the center does not have a presence in those schools. One might think that with a million dollars, a center could produce research and establish itself in the schools. That is clearly not the case here.
The reason for it being such a sad report on research is obviously due to it being an outdated link in this thread. The one now available on the CISE web page is http://www.usm.edu/cise/center%20for%20literacy.htm
That said, what is the reason that there seems to be no research in the new pages either. Hmmmm, no progress in 2 years? Fine use of tax dollars.
Now, after having visited the site within the last 32 seconds I can still say that the research section is still awful and all in all a real piece of shyte.
Unlike true peer reviewed and competitive grant funding mechanisms (not a few Senators from adjoining states hashing it out after, maybe, a softball review by insiders), marks seem to have a life of their own and can survive on fluff progess reports. What most folks here don't realize is that who gets to eat at the trough at USM is controlled, in part, by the VP Research and ED. My department has been told to pick up some pork dollars, but the VP's office has not been very helpful or enthusiastic about this when approached. CISE therefore gets the first and biggest bite from Thad Cochrane's office, and others get the crumbs. So, the Prez and Provost have nailed us for this lack of sufficient engagement in this area, while his kid hogs this source of bucks. Go figure.
I get the impression that at least one department at USM would not fare well in terms of external funding if it had to rely on peer reviewed and competitive grant funding mechanisms.
When there is a new VP for Research and ED (if Burge retires as has been stated), will this curtail the proliferation of pork projects in "certain areas?"
"Burge retires as has been stated" -- this is news. Stated where? Btw, I know nothing about Dr. Burge, just interested in seeing who in the current administration goes where.
"Burge retires as has been stated" -- this is news. Stated where? Btw, I know nothing about Dr. Burge, just interested in seeing who in the current administration goes where.
"Stated" as in the campus grapevine some time back. Cecil has been here since 1970 I think, so he has more than put in his PERS years.
If you get a grant that requires no research, does that come under teaching or service at raise time or do we have an implicit category that resembles the world's oldest profession?
If you get a grant that requires no research, does that come under teaching or service at raise time or do we have an implicit category that resembles the world's oldest profession?