Don't fool yourself: these sentiments aren't isolated. What's even worse is that there are plenty of politicians out there more than willing to cater to this type of sensibility.
Don't forget: the lynchers of Emmet Till never went to jail even though two of them confessed to killing Till to "Life" magazine back in the day; and don't forget Trent Lott honored Strom Thurmond's retirement by "joking" that his election to President in 1948 would have "solved a lot of problems"; and don't forget that Haley Barbour was photographed at the Blackhawk Barbecue cavorting with members of the CCC (read "KKK") and never bothered to issue an explanation; and don't forget that an overwhelming majority of white Mississippians voted to retain the old state flag with its Confederate symbol even though the whole fugging world thinks that symbol is synonymous with racism and genocide; and don't forget that the Harrison County board of supervisors voted along racial lines to retain the Confederate battle flag at county expense on the beach in Biloxi/Gulfport .
;whole fugging world thinks that symbol is synonymous with racism and genocide;
But they DON'T think that. You don't know what it was like to be a child in the South in the 1950's. There was a whole generation of people still alive then whose parents were alive in the Civil War and the Reconstruction. I knew some of them. That flag is not about slavery and genocide to them, it's about resistance to "tyranny" and "northern oppression." You have to think about who white Southerners are. They're Scots and Irish. They're intensely tribal (plus musical, story-telling and can't hold their liquor.) You don't grasp the emotional significance of the flag and the war and all that. It's not rational, it's not even healthy, but it goes very, very deep.
Here is another--Do you remember that Ronald Reagan kicked off his 1980 presidential bid at the Neshoba Co. fair--just so those there wansn't any doubt about where he stood. Made me sick then; still does.
One minor correction: It was LOOK magazine in which Milam and Bryant made their confessions. There's a nice essay in Slate.com magazine here that explains how that story came to be written.
Ronald Reagan kicked off his 1980 presidential bid at the Neshoba Co. fair--just so those there wansn't any doubt about where he stood. Made me sick then; still does.
If something as innocuous as a presidential candidate choosing a county fair to kick off a campaign makes you sick maybe you should see a doctor. Would you have felt better if he gave his speech on steps of the dome?
Don't fool yourself: these sentiments aren't isolated. What's even worse is that there are plenty of politicians out there more than willing to cater to this type of sensibility. Don't forget: the lynchers of Emmet Till never went to jail even though two of them confessed to killing Till to "Life" magazine back in the day; and don't forget Trent Lott honored Strom Thurmond's retirement by "joking" that his election to President in 1948 would have "solved a lot of problems"; and don't forget that Haley Barbour was photographed at the Blackhawk Barbecue cavorting with members of the CCC (read "KKK") and never bothered to issue an explanation; and don't forget that an overwhelming majority of white Mississippians voted to retain the old state flag with its Confederate symbol even though the whole fugging world thinks that symbol is synonymous with racism and genocide; and don't forget that the Harrison County board of supervisors voted along racial lines to retain the Confederate battle flag at county expense on the beach in Biloxi/Gulfport . Just don't forget . . .
You're right -- those sentiment's aren't isolated. Moreover, they aren't isolated to Mississippi, as you seem to suggest. There are racists in every city, in every county, and in every state in this country. Thus, perhaps you should put down the broad brush with which you're trying to paint the citizens of this state.
Those same Mississippians who voted to retain the old state flag are the same Mississippians who brought Emmet Till to justice in court of law after all these years. And those same Mississippians are also the ones that just convicted him. Furthermore, those same Mississippians have brought others like Till to justice in the past few years. That would have never happened in Mississippi 40 years ago. In fact, I didn't.
And you want to base your little diatribe on the symbolism you attribute to a state flag? Or a photo of the governor at a barbeque?
Next time, before you're so quick to paint Mississippians with such a broad brush, keep in mind that the very thing that gave rise to this discussion in the first place--the trial and conviction of Emmet Till--suggests that Mississippi isn't quite what you're making it out to be.
So? The Choctaw reservation is also located in Neshoba County near Philadelphia. Would you censure their two casinos and water park also just because they are located there?
Before you try to recreate the masterpiece, you might want to identify the subjects. Emmett Till was the victim of another of these racist acts. "After all these years" his body was just exhumed in an effort to bring justice to others like Edgar Ray Killen.
Don't fool yourself: these sentiments aren't isolated. What's even worse is that there are plenty of politicians out there more than willing to cater to this type of sensibility. Don't forget: the lynchers of Emmet Till never went to jail even though two of them confessed to killing Till to "Life" magazine back in the day; and don't forget Trent Lott honored Strom Thurmond's retirement by "joking" that his election to President in 1948 would have "solved a lot of problems"; and don't forget that Haley Barbour was photographed at the Blackhawk Barbecue cavorting with members of the CCC (read "KKK") and never bothered to issue an explanation; and don't forget that an overwhelming majority of white Mississippians voted to retain the old state flag with its Confederate symbol even though the whole fugging world thinks that symbol is synonymous with racism and genocide; and don't forget that the Harrison County board of supervisors voted along racial lines to retain the Confederate battle flag at county expense on the beach in Biloxi/Gulfport . Just don't forget . . .
Would it please you if adult Mississippian's were not allowed to vote or serve on juries?
Those same Mississippians who voted to retain the old state flag are the same Mississippians who brought Emmet Till to justice in court of law after all these years. And those same Mississippians are also the ones that just convicted him. Furthermore, those same Mississippians have brought others like Till to justice in the past few years. That would have never happened in Mississippi 40 years ago. In fact, I didn't. And you want to base your little diatribe on the symbolism you attribute to a state flag? Or a photo of the governor at a barbeque? Next time, before you're so quick to paint Mississippians with such a broad brush, keep in mind that the very thing that gave rise to this discussion in the first place--the trial and conviction of Emmet Till--suggests that Mississippi isn't quite what you're making it out to be.
Tell me that this is just poorly worded and that an "eagle" could not possibly be this ill-informed or callous.
I'm not ever going to defend racism. But I had an interesting conversation many years ago. I was a freshman at Northwestern U. and had a friend from northern Minnesota. We were talking about my home town, Memphis Tn. (This was 1968.) My friend made the comment, "well, my parents would be thrilled if I brought a black friend home to visit, but I'd better not let an Indian in the house!" It's not a Southern thing, it's a human thing. We always need to hate "others" for whatever reason.
I think it says a lot that Killen was convicted, but don't forget he would have been convicted the first time if not for one juror. Eleven other white jurors were apparently ready to do the right thing then too.
You're absolutely right -- I totally misread the topic in my haste to make a reply, and confused Emmet Till with Edgar Ray Killen. My mistake--and a very embarrassing one at that.
However, my point does stand, to an extent. The questions about the racism of Mississippians, especially as it pertains to the state flag vote, is mitigated by the very nature of the things we've seen happeing in Mississippi's courts involving Killen, and others of that ilk.
Don't fool yourself: these sentiments aren't isolated. What's even worse is that there are plenty of politicians out there more than willing to cater to this type of sensibility. Don't forget: the lynchers of Emmet Till never went to jail even though two of them confessed to killing Till to "Life" magazine back in the day; and don't forget Trent Lott honored Strom Thurmond's retirement by "joking" that his election to President in 1948 would have "solved a lot of problems"; and don't forget that Haley Barbour was photographed at the Blackhawk Barbecue cavorting with members of the CCC (read "KKK") and never bothered to issue an explanation; and don't forget that an overwhelming majority of white Mississippians voted to retain the old state flag with its Confederate symbol even though the whole fugging world thinks that symbol is synonymous with racism and genocide; and don't forget that the Harrison County board of supervisors voted along racial lines to retain the Confederate battle flag at county expense on the beach in Biloxi/Gulfport . Just don't forget . . .
You forgot to add that Trent Lott recently voted against the bill to apologize for not passing the lunching law.
FPM - + wrote: Whether you agree with it or not, she at least has the guts to put her name to her opinion.
You make a good point.
These recent prosecutions of elderly men for actions taken many decades ago have revealed to me the true merits of statutes of limitation, even in criminal matters. According to my old copy of Black’s Law Dictionary
“In criminal cases, however, a statute of limitation is an act of grace, a surrendering by sovereign of its right to prosecute.”
The people behind these prosecutions are devoid of grace, and their motivations are patently self-serving. The spectacle of pseudo-witnesses reading aloud in court the ancient testimony of the deceased shakes whatever faith I have left in our judicial system. Yes, these trials do say a lot about Mississippi.
Could any of our legal scholars cite similar cases of prosecution of elderly subjects for crimes committed so long ago?
Could any of our legal scholars cite similar cases of prosecution of elderly subjects for crimes committed so long ago?
I'm not a legal scholar, but I do recall that Nazi war criminals have been prosecuted whenever possible, at whatever age they are finally apprehended. I assume there are finally none left.
I also can't think of a legal system that has a statute of limitations on murder; a google search for "statute of limitations" and "homicide" yields no exceptions. Nor does Christianity condone murder, though the the person who wrote to the editor seems to think it does.
You forgot to add that Trent Lott recently voted against the bill to apologize for not passing the lunching law.
The apology for not passing the "lynching law" is ridiculous. Murder was illegal in the US then, just as it is now. We have had laws against murder for many years in this country, and it doesn't matter what the weapon is: gun, knife, automobile, or rope.
Could any of our legal scholars cite similar cases of prosecution of elderly subjects for crimes committed so long ago?
Now that the obvious cases of Nazi war crimes have been mentioned, can anybody cite an instance within the United States but outside the borders of Mississippi?
LeftASAP wrote: You forgot to add that Trent Lott recently voted against the bill to apologize for not passing the lunching law. The apology for not passing the "lynching law" is ridiculous. Murder was illegal in the US then, just as it is now. We have had laws against murder for many years in this country, and it doesn't matter what the weapon is: gun, knife, automobile, or rope.
Isn't murder against "state law"? The "anti-lynching law" was/is a federal law. It would have allowed the murderers to be tried in federal court instead of state court. As it was the feds could only try the murders for violation civil rights and I believe none convicted served over 6 years.
Why are we fighting terrorists in Iraq yet still debating this terrorism forty years later?
LeftASAP wrote: Isn't murder against "state law"? The "anti-lynching law" was/is a federal law. It would have allowed the murderers to be tried in federal court instead of state court. As it was the feds could only try the murders for violation civil rights and I believe none convicted served over 6 years. Why are we fighting terrorists in Iraq yet still debating this terrorism forty years later?
In case you haven't read it lately, any powers not expressly granted to the federal government were reserved for the states in the Constitution. Murder on federal property is a federal deal. Otherwise, it's a state deal. The "lynching law" was just another attempt by an activist federal system to grab power from the states.
As has been pointed out, 11 of the 12 white jurors voted to convict Killen years ago. I defy you to give me a reason why a whole state gets this reputation based on the actions of 8.33% of the people.
This looks like just another way to harp on how backward Mississippi is. Why don't you just dig through the MS Constitution and find some outdated law prohibiting eating popcorn in church or riding a mule through town? Last time I looked, majority white juries were doing the right thing in Mississippi.
Also, I believe more than 50% of Mississippians weren't even alive when the Killen case took place (they either weren't born or have moved here recently in retirement). You're characterizing a whole state based on a small portion of less than half of the citizens. Bad logic, there.
... I defy you to give me a reason why a whole state gets this reputation based on the actions of 8.33% of the people. ...
Maybe because 80% of the population supported what the 8% did. Terrorists don't live in a vacuum. The population must support them. Like the insurgents in Iraq get the support of a large part of the population in certain parts of Iraq, so were the terrorists in Mississippi.
Did you notice how few spoke out when the KKK used the confederate battle flag as their symbol? Sure is WAS the symbol for southern independence. But when it was stolen and desecrated by the KKK in their terrorism, why did no one complain about the misuse of that flag? That is why that flag has lost the symbolism that justifies its existence.
Did you notice how few spoke out when the KKK used the confederate battle flag as their symbol? . . why did no one complain about the misuse of that flag?
For the same reason the federal government didn't speak out in protest when USM adopted the Eagle as its mascot. One would have to be pretty dense to think that USM's views represent the view of the U.S. government just because they both use the symbolic Eagle.
How do you know that "no one spoke out" -- how would one "speak out" ?
I see the American flag abused in all sorts of ways, used on underwear and used for paper plates and burned & desecrated in all kinds of demonstrations here and abroad. How do you propose that I stop that?