Item #3 (Update on Retirements and Departures) on the thread entitled "Myron's PUC Report" states: "In the past three years, USM has averaged 95 departures."
An average of 95 departures per year over three years would mean that USM has lost 285 faculty members during a brief three-year period in its history. This must be some sort of state or national record. It almost certainly reflects more departures than occurred when Mississippi Industrial College in Holly Springs closed its doors and no faculty whatsoever were left behind; or when Yadkin College (North Carolina) closed its doors in 1895 and all of its remaining faculty departed.
A big difference is that in the case of those two defunct schools (Mississippi Industrial College and Yadkn College) no students were left behind. USM does have students left behind. The students who are left behind at USM are left without the very large number of senior or marketable faculty members who have departed. The USM students who are left behind are at a university whose current reputation will make comparable faculty replacements next to impossible in the short haul and extremely difficult in the long haul.
An average of 95 departures per year over three years would mean that USM has lost 285 faculty members during a brief three-year period in its history. This must be some sort of state or national record.
You could be right about possibly setting a state or national record. The 285 figure represents about 50% of the faculty.
. . .A big difference is that in the case of those two defunct schools (Mississippi Industrial College and Yadkn College) no students were left behind. USM does have students left behind. The students who are left behind at USM are left without the very large number of senior or marketable faculty members who have departed. The USM students who are left behind are at a university whose current reputation will make comparable faculty replacements next to impossible in the short haul and extremely difficult in the long haul.
Perhaps the students left behind should retain the services of Kim Chaze and file a class action suit against SFT and the IHL.
next to impossible in the short haul and extremely difficult in the long haul. Perhaps the students left behind should retain the services of Kim Chaze and file a class action suit against SFT and the IHL.
Or maybe several thousand individual suits. And don't forget the alumni whose diplomas rest to some extent on the reputation of the institution. Or the parents who footed many of the tuition bills.
Does anyone want to write a letter to the editor about this fact that is apparently being swept under the rug?
You are, of course, referring to the part about the 285 departures (about 95 departures per year over three years) representing about 50% of the faculty?
Newsworthy wrote: Under rug swept wrote: Does anyone want to write a letter to the editor about this fact that is apparently being swept under the rug? You are, of course, referring to the part about the 285 departures (about 95 departures per year over three years) representing about 50% of the faculty?