Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: H.A. 6/09/05
Reporter

Date:
H.A. 6/09/05
Permalink Closed


Major changes, retaliation not on Thames' agenda

By Reuben Mees


http://www.hattiesburgamerican.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050609/NEWS01/506090311/1002



__________________
LVN

Date:
Permalink Closed

I am trying to imagine a situation at any other university where the word "retaliation" should even be part of the discussion. Out of curiousity, how would faculty "retaliate" against Dr. Thames? It seems like Retaliation Street only runs one way.

__________________
USM Sympathizer

Date:
Permalink Closed

"I'm not in the business of retaliating. I have to do what I think is best for this university, and if I spend all my time retaliating," it would be a full-time job, since most of the faculty and staff have opposed me by huge and embarrassing margins.


[I made that last part up.]



__________________
USM Alum

Date:
Permalink Closed

The gravity of this headline to me is astounding.  The fact that Thames was asked publicly whether he would retailate against faculty and staff and the fact that this was the headline in a newspaper is quiet frankly disturbing, and would be regardless of whether the person in question was the president of a univeristy or president of IBM, especially in such a public manner.  Wow.  I hope that Thames sees this as a negative reflection on his character and reputation.  However, I doubt he will.  Problably goes without saying, but it also reflects poorly on the college board.


Management professors need to save this headline.  It would make, in my opinion, for excellent discussion.



__________________
Far Away Alum

Date:
Permalink Closed

"As far as the other goes, I'm not in the business of retaliating. I have to do what I think is best for this university, and if I spend all my time retaliating, this university won't move forward."

When Pigs Fly! When Pigs Fly!

__________________
Emma

Date:
Permalink Closed

"As far as the other goes, I'm not in the business of retaliating. I have to do what I think is best for this university, and if I spend all my time retaliating, this university won't move forward."

Oh, Shelby , you've been in the business of retaliating for YEARS and YEARS. You "have to do" what you think is best for you, and since you've spent all of your time retaliating, this university has moved the other direction.  

__________________
Not enough hours in the day

Date:
Permalink Closed

Far Away Alum wrote:


".....and if I spend all my time retaliating, this university won't move forward."

Does this sound like somebody thinks there are lots of things to reliate for?

__________________
Voter

Date:
Permalink Closed


Emma wrote:

Oh, Shelby , you've been in the business of retaliating for YEARS and YEARS. You "have to do" what you think is best for you, and since you've spent all of your time retaliating, this university has moved the other direction.  



__________________
Forrest Gump

Date:
Permalink Closed

Stupid is as Stupid does. The cycle will repeat.

__________________
Agent

Date:
Permalink Closed

USM Alum wrote:


Management professors need to save this headline.  It would make, in my opinion, for excellent discussion.

The only books resulting from this debacle are NOT the ones coming out of Coal (past and present).  How NOT to run an academic organization is evidently a hot topic.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard