What I find surprising about this whole affair over the past month or so is that the administration has not even paid lip service to any difference between tenured and untenured faculty. Perhaps some gestures will be made as this situation unfolds. The administration's lack of concern about tenure in recent years and the financial straits the university seems to be in present an unsettling climate for faculty members.
The administration also seems in no hurry to present the entire package of cuts so everyone knows what really may or may not happen. Uncertainty and nervousness are not good for Southern Miss.
I wish I knew what the thinking was behind terminating TOE. It doesn't make much sense to me. Administration says it is numbers but as anyone can see from the article, there are programs with lower numbers than TOEs. I find it interesting that Economics can swing a deal whereas TOE is left standing alone. Is terminating 3 professors the answer to the universities problems?
The overall problem is we will never be told what all the final cuts are. We will each have pieces to the puzzle and no guide on how they go together.
If the president wants transparency, and if she wants buy-in from faculty, staff, and students, she needs to declare what the cuts are. There is no reason for secrecy.
First you need to check the fact. HA has the number wrong or someone feed them the wrong numbers. (surprise, surprise, someone trying to bloat their numbers) TOE doesn't have 1/2 that many students. 5 minutes of simple research was all it took to check those numbers.
Second You also have to look at degrees awarded.
Third Mississippi no longer requires instructors to get TOE and hasn't for a while, so why continue a program that not many want nor need.