ssDude

You are a pro-Thames idiot.

You'd be shocked if you knew who I was.

You said: "With your future tactics, you should take care to distinguish yourself from the real faculty, especially those who care about USM."

Who is "your" here????????? You cannot in any way define that to us. It is everyone on campus, you stupid jerk.

Tactics? Why are you concerned with tactics and not the outcome? Are you a Thames special mid-year raise recipient? I am sure you would not tell the truth there.

Real faculty (convervative, George Bush supporters?????????bidness????)

vs.

Those bad faculty on AAUP who do NOT care about USM??????????


What a confusion of logic turned upside down on itself.

ssDude you sh*#a%%)(---------- get the hell off this board !

GO LOOK AT THE NO CONFIDENCE VOTES

450 against Thames: this MUST include many conservatives and necessarily George Bush supporters who also love the university. This must include many more moderate, apolitical professors. This includes people from CoST who despise what SFT is doing and they showed up in large numbers. This must, yes ssDude idiot, include the ones you hate, the liberals. It includes a majority cross section of ALL USM profs and staff, no matter who the hell they are because they love USM and want to see it prosper, not die to fourth tier below Jackson State.


32 For Thames: this super-minority included staff around him who had to say "yes" to keep their jobs and those who directly were paid off, yes they would not dare vote against him. They are the ones, who do NOT love USM, but love their own pocketbooks. They are the true villians. A smaller subgroup of them, a very short list of these, are unfortunately just misinformed, erstwhile good ole' Southerners who respect the man in charge and display "loyalty" more so than any knowledge of the wholesale destruction of USM's viability as a tier III university.


Your whole argument is as futile as Bob Mixon and Scott Ross and Dr. Doug Rouse trying to stop the Titanic from sinking.

You will lose bro.
ssDude, you are without any argument or support or logic whatsoever.

Are you one of the 32 who voted "confidence in Thames?"

I doubt you even took the time to vote.