After the IHL Board meets with the SACS consultant (Margaret) today, they have a meeting scheduled with Lisa Mader. Both are closed-door. What is going on?
Maybe they want to question the SACS consultant to see if it really is a violation of SACS principles for an outside group to exert undue influence on the IHL Board. Then they may want to ask Lisa Mader if she organized the recent meeting.
If this is true, then too bad it is in closed session.
quote: Originally posted by: LeavingASAP "Maybe they want to question the SACS consultant to see if it really is a violation of SACS principles for an outside group to exert undue influence on the IHL Board. Then they may want to ask Lisa Mader if she organized the recent meeting. If this is true, then too bad it is in closed session. "
How unusual is it for Lisa Mader or any university PR person to be called in to an IHL meeting? And behind closed doors? Does closed door policy necessarily mean a personnel matter?
I hope the answers are very, even more so, and yes. Mader should be severely reprimanded for her involvement in the 3/10 meeting and her repeated, blatant lying. She's done almost as much as Thames to destroy the reputation of the university.
quote: Originally posted by: SaveUSM "Sounds like they will get an earful about what is going wrong and then meet with ToMader to decide how to spin it."
If the Board thinks Lisa Mader has any credibility remaining, their judgment isn't merely poor... it's completely shot.