Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: L and P on Doty's response
Robert Campbell

Date:
L and P on Doty's response
Permalink Closed


I've posted a quick update on Liberty and Power, mentioning Dean Doty's response to the Black Friday memo:


http://hnn.us/blogs/entries/10139.html


I still have some other developments to catch up on (such as Shelby Thames' hypocritical assurances to the PUC about AACSB accreditation).  Will try to get to them later.


Robert Campbell



__________________
LVN

Date:
Permalink Closed

Robert, what's your take on the legal ramifications? It reads to me as if HD has accused the President & Provost of knowingly violating the law. (Ironic considering all the noise that was made over G & S's so-called crimes! )


__________________
Emma

Date:
Permalink Closed

LVN,


The law has been violated by SFT.  He'll hold it up in court somehow, but Doty will get his day. He'll also be more marketable nationally since he stood up to SFT. SFT's support means nothing outside lower Mississippi.



__________________
LVN

Date:
Permalink Closed

And I am anxiously awaiting Mr. Klumb's response. He did not hesitate to publicly brand G & S as "criminals" on far less authority than the word of a Dean.

__________________
Outside Observer

Date:
Permalink Closed

quote:

Originally posted by: LVN

"And I am anxiously awaiting Mr. Klumb's response. He did not hesitate to publicly brand G & S as "criminals" on far less authority than the word of a Dean. "

Someone should sift through all of his comments, and throw them back in his face when this eventually goes down.

__________________
Emma

Date:
Permalink Closed

My most esteemed LVN -


You are so correct. Let the Branding begin, (and let's fight back).



__________________
Robert Campbell

Date:
Permalink Closed


quote:


Originally posted by: LVN
"Robert, what's your take on the legal ramifications? It reads to me as if HD has accused the President & Provost of knowingly violating the law. (Ironic considering all the noise that was made over G & S's so-called crimes! ) "


LVN,


Dean Doty is claiming, in the passage quoted beloew,  that Thames (and Malone!) rejected a female candidate for a department chair position on account of her being female.


I realize that there may be legal difficulties surrounding the hiring of a new department chair for Tourism Management.  As I have previously stated, I believe that gender was used as a motivating factor when an offer of employment was not extended to a previous candidate.  At that time I advised you, President Thames, and Dr. Malone that in my opinion your decision to override the recommendation of the faculty, the department, and the dean of the College of Business was unwise and could have negative legal consequences for the university.


I'm not that well versed in the relevant law, but I have no doubt that this is a big "exposure," as they used to say at IBM.  I wonder whether Kim Chaze represents the candidate who was turned down...


Robert Campbell


 


 



__________________
Robert Campbell

Date:
Permalink Closed

That should be the passage quoted below...

__________________
Stranger Than Fiction

Date:
Permalink Closed

Oh yes, given that this will be Doty's second lawsuit against his employer, I'll bet that other would-be defendants will be lining up to hire him.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard