I had dinner last night with a person on "the inside" (and high up) with higher education in the state. He told me that Shelby is absolutely livid with the business school (and its Dean) at USM for expelling the economic development department. In fact, SFT has (had) been working on a plan to divest the business school from USM. Here are the nuts and bolts of the plan. USM would give the business school and its faculty to Miss State. This person (and an acquaintance from the b-school once) told me that State's business college has historically been alot worse than those at both Ole Miss and USM, and no matter what State has tried, it can't seem to make up any ground. Well, this move would be instant credibility for them. USM's b-school apparently has some good faculty/programs that would boost State's business school visibility.
The USM faculty would continue to work from Hattiesburg/Green Hall, and any "USM students" who majored in business would receive MSU diplomas upon graduation (the b-school faculty would become MSU---Hattiesburg faculty). The ability to get their core studies through USM is/was still being finalized. The IHL hasn't finalized how the students are to be counted in terms of enrollment --- looks like a formula that allows both institutions to count them would be (have been) used. State would pay USM some kind of "fee" for servicing these students, faculty, staff. Ultimately, the "school" would be moved out of Green Hall and into the old Albertson's site in Cloverleaf Mall.
As it was explained to me, the whole plan is loved by SFT because he (1) gets rid of the b-school from both USM's organizational chart and from campus [he really hates them], (2) he gets to maintain his enrollment at current/future levels, and (3) USM would be making a major move towards becoming the hard science/technical institute SFT so strongly desires. The kicker, as I was told, is that Klumb and Ross are ecstatic about this idea. This plays right into their idea for moving their alma up in world, and perhaps supressing USM (the way they see it playing out, though not the way SFT sees it playing out; we all know who would be correct here).
The main problem: The SACS probation issue. Of course, the plan is now on hold, and according to my dinner companion, likely permanently now.
I've heard on numerous occasions that State really wants control of the education scene down on the coast. It looks like an invading army scenario. If this story came to fruition, once they secured things in Hattiesburg, I suspect MSU would begin a drive to the South to take over things there.
quote: Originally posted by: Just Heard This Last Night " Ultimately, the "school" would be moved out of Green Hall and into the old Albertson's site in Cloverleaf Mall. "
Does the Albertson's building have air conditioning in the summer?
Athough this is probably just some world class leg pulling, it has more logic than many of the administration's cockamamy plans! Shelby may indeed want to get rid of THIS accredited business school but don't think for a nanosecond that he doesn't want an on-line Phoenix University model business school. Under this scenario, there would certainly be a newly formed College of Economic Development and Business.
quote: Originally posted by: "These are the times..." "So if this goes through, will USM soon be a "hub university" where all other state colleges/universities will each control a department? "
There was a lot of discussion several years ago about establishing a "universities center" on the Coast instead of expanding Gulf Park to "co-campus" status. In the Universities Center scenario, every university would have office & classroom space to allow a mix of majors that no single institution could provide.
For example, surveys conducted during the last year or so of Horace Fleming's presidency repeatedly showed that engineering (not "engineering technology") was a highly desired major on the Coast. This would mean that MSU, not USM, would need to have a presence on the Coast.
Similarly, all the brouhaha about a Medical School on the Coast would ultimately mean that Ole Miss (actually UMC) would have to have a presence on the Coast. (Anyone who seriously entertains the idea of a USM Medical School needs a reality check.)
Unfortunately, the main model for a Universities Center is the "campus" where the IHL offices are located. It has not worked out quite as it was originally envisioned...
I hearby volunteer the Liberal Arts core departments to become part of Ole Miss.! That would be the happiest development in years, especially if they sent down their own dean.
When a unversity changes its name, its former graduates are typically given the opportunity to receive a new diploma under the new university name. If Hattiesburg programs are transferred to the jurisdiction of another state university. then former graduates of those departments should be given a similar opportunity. For example, if USM's Business School becomes Mississippi State's Business School, its former graduates should receive Mississippi State diplomas. Former graduates should demand this.
After doing some investigating, the word I got is that this plan is for real, and may not quite be dead in the water. There could be some movement on it this May (keep your ears to the ground).
This sounds like an excellent plan. B-school gets to be associated with an institution with a better reputation, MSU aquires the publishing power of the b-school faculty which will enhance their reputation. Thames gets rid of one of the profit centers of the university (not sure why this is good business). Not sure about the viability of a former grocery store as an academic facility, particularly for a program as big as the b-school.
quote: Originally posted by: Person of Interest "When a unversity changes its name, its former graduates are typically given the opportunity to receive a new diploma under the new university name. If Hattiesburg programs are transferred to the jurisdiction of another state university. then former graduates of those departments should be given a similar opportunity. For example, if USM's Business School becomes Mississippi State's Business School, its former graduates should receive Mississippi State diplomas. Former graduates should demand this. "
If something like what is described here actually happens, IHL should offer every USM alumnus the option of getting a diploma from another of its institutions. Personally, I'm hoping to trade my USM doctorate for one from UMC.
My guess is that this would be fine with the B school faculty. We would get to keep all or our USM friends and work for a better university. For us this is a Win-Win situation! Where do we sign up?
I heard of this plan a week or so ago, and I also heard that there is a stack of about 45 new contracts in the dome that have MSU on them (for future signatures from business faculty) that were to be shown to the IHL for consideration. Anyone else heard this part?
Could it just be a way to phase out the B-school from the Hattiesburg scence, I'm not so sure any of this is real or makes sense, and the CoB Faculty might look at the more sinister aspects of the plan. I wouldn't stop dusting off those vitas yet.
Why would MSU want a presence in Hattiesburg? It seems more likely if they are going to have to remodel space anyway that they would want to set up shop on the coast somewhere close to I-10. At the risk of suggesting Shelby might be on to something.... This actually sounds like a good idea for 1. The state of Mississippi 2. MSU 3. CoB faculty. Unfortunately, as is typical of most of Shelby's wild ideas, this actually doesn't sound like a good idea for USM.
This would be a quick way to move MSU up the academic rankings. USM business faculty has consistently outpublished them for years and by combining faculties they would have significantly more faculty to add research to the pile. Having a nationally recognized (tier 2) business school in MS would be great for the state. As far as faculty are concerned, being associated with a higher quality university and being out from under Shelby's reign of terror can't be a bad thing.
None of this makes sense. You can't have some free floating b-school unattached to a campus of some sort. It sure wouldn't feel like a college experience to me and I would hate teaching at a place like that--well except under these extreme circumstances, I'd teach anywhere I could to be away from the incompetence at Hattiesburg. I don't think the satellite B-school of MSU would be the same as the self-contained B-school...It would serve as an exective MBA or some sort branch, an online branch, everything that it seems to be moving to on the coast...a school that virtual and barely existent. I think it is dangerous, and without a b-school at Hattiesburg, you are losing a significant number of students and program possibilities...if all this wild speculation is somehow grounded in fact, I am worried. This is bad.
If State or Ole Miss got a presence on the coast, it would be the beginning of the end for USM on the coast. People would prefer degrees from those schools. If MSU could do business, why not science or liberal arts? The best deal for faculty, staff, and students on the Hattiesburg campus would be to become UM at Hattiesburg. It works for UNC- Charlotte and UT- El Paso.
I am no fan of Thames and I certainly don't have any "inside" information, but this rumor is bunk. No major university would allow its Business school to be "given away" not even if it is being led by a world class idiot.
School of Nursing in Hattiesburg appears to be part of a master plan also, unsure what at this point. UMC School of Nursing has expanded to Oxford, all programs will be offered for first time on Oxford campus in Fall of this year, using Memphis hospitals, this is historical and unprecedented. And a great move for them. Hattiesburg campus has been slowly ignored, allowed to die on the vine, little to no resources, ditched move to ANY building, Albertsons plan died without explanation after big money to architect for renovation, no mention for over a year as to what we will do with this "sick" building we are in (EPA designation for mold and asbestos, etc), we have outgrown building and it cannot be repaired, while Gulf Park is the golden child, VA "benefits"--use for classes, including pre-nursing for RNs as well as purchase of small private hospital on HWY90 (includes leased space for of all things Homeland Security?), money flowing down there, now will double enrollment, we are losing faculty at alarming speed without replacing, down to 8 tenured for entire School of Nursing (all three campuses, 500 plus students), doesn't look good? So how does this fit into the University Center plan, Business School vision? We are truly in the dark and sick due to the unhealthy living environment, living on antihistamines and air filters and trying to convince students that they have selected the best school of nursing. Getting harder to do with part time instructors and such. We try to limit admissions and administration forces us to go back to 60 per semester (we have close to 200 qualify), with worst nursing shortage in history, hard to justify. BUT we also have a national faculty shortage, and guess how that plays out at USM? NO ONE will come here. Just like the rest of the campus, except that we have around six openings and no one applies. When they apply, time passes, candidate has time to review and, low and behold they withdraw. How shocking.
Any thoughts? We have very few veterans left. So I fear the new faculty who have no history think this is "normal", they have little allegiance, no idea of professional ideology, what kind of vision are we creating? Sister Harkins must be rolling over.
With all of this talk about MSU and UM taking over different colleges from USM, why isn't JSU, Delta St., or Alcorn being thrown in the mix? I wouldn't be surprised if they raised hell if these rumors are in fact true.
In the mid-to-late '80s the IHL Board investigated the possibility of reducing the number of colleges in Mississippi. They sent up a trial balloon disclosing the possible closing of Mississippi Valley and merging the "W" with State, thereby reducing the number of colleges from seven to five. Of course, the constituencies of those two schools went ballistic and were able to end discussion of closure and merger.
I think we are seeing "Plan B" unfold. This time they were quiet about it.
quote: Originally posted by: ram "I think we are seeing "Plan B" unfold. This time they were quiet about it."
Perhaps so, but I'm taking this rumor with two grains of salt right now. Something about it smacks of being a massive practical joke.
Just bear in mind that if MSU gets the b-school, then it has a (literal) beachhead on the Coast, which as I've pointed out before, is hot-to-trot to get an engineering school.
If USM is the lab rat for an experiment in reorganizing the state's universities, then IHL needs to make the experiment public instead of trying to bring it in under the radar. It is already obvious to most folks here that IHL (a) doesn't know for beans about what universities are supposed to be & (b) doesn't give a rat's about the University of Southern Mississippi, except as a physical plant that might be used as a fancy industrial park.
i've never taken this rumor seriously. look at the original message--it was a dinner conversation. i immediately thought--and how many scotch and waters did you have at dinner?