"The USM Faculty Senate unanimously adopted a resolution at its regular monthly meeting Nov. 2 urging the administration to "undertake a timely study of market compensation averages of staff in time to make appropriate and competitive adjustments" that could be implemented in the 2009 fiscal year starting next July 1." ...
"We will be moving forward on this resolution," Saunders responded in a prepared statement. "My executive cabinet has been discussing the issue in recent weeks. I'm glad we are getting faculty support."...
"A cost-cutting move by the Thames administration to outsource the USM physical plant operation in 2006 met a dead end at the state College Board after a petition opposing the move was signed by 124 physical plant employees, most of whom were concerned about losing access to the state retirement system. The Faculty Senate also opposed the action.
I know that a number of departments lost valuable craftspeople during this period of uncertainty," said Judd, an associate professor of theater. "
"It is our belief that staff compensation at the University of Southern Mississippi has been low historically in comparison with compensation for comparable work at colleges and universities in the Gulf South Region.
The contributions staff make to the success of USM faculty and students are notable. Staff are often the first responders to questions and concerns students may have. They attend to physical environments to assure those environments are conducive to learning and discovery. Staff provide direct support to faculty on many projects and initiatives. Succinctly put, staff are essential to the success of the University of Southern Mississippi. Members of the Faculty Senate support efforts to adjust staff compensation upward to more accurately reflect market salaries and to assure members of the USM staff receive compensation that recognizes their essential roles as members of the USM family. Further, the Faculty Senate supports upward adjustments in staff compensation to assure staff receive wages and benefits that will provide for a satisfactory standard of living.
In the context of previous paragraphs, members of the Faculty Senate urge the Administration to undertake a timely study of market compensation averages of staff in time to make appropriate and competitive adjustments for USM staff for FY 2009.
The resolution was moved by Senator Smith, seconded by Senator O=Brien, and passed without dissent."
Can faculty senate also discuss our dreadful health insurance? There is near universal aggreement that our health insurance is awful, but nothing is ever done to change the situation. When I went through orientation 2 1/2 years ago, the folks in HR even said that our health insurance was aful. Anyone up for a grassroots campaign to change the situation?
Unfortunately, because our insurance is self-insured through the State, I do not know if much can be done to make it pay better without increasing the premiums again.
We (state employees and teachers) are an awfully large group. So, why can't the state negotiate a better plan for us. Something stinks about the deal. We should organize a sick day for all state employees and teachers. Then, the state might be more motivated to get us a better deal.
As Southern Belle pointed out, the state plan is paid for by the state. Blue Cross merely administers it. There is no insurance company to negotiate with, and the plan must balance expenditures with premiums. The university pays the premiums for employees.
The university does't pay premiums for spouses and children. As you know, those premiums are a bit high and come with a high deductible. Outside of a catastrophe, the insurance seems worthless.
Believe me, I understand the frustration with our current insurance coverage and the high costs for family members. However, something is better than nothing.
If faculty and staff of Southern Miss could receive a decent raise, we may be able to purchase a supplemental insurance policy to offset the high deductible and none covered charges.
For those of us who have been on campus for a while, know that raises have been few and far in between. When raises are received (and we have been grateful for each raise received), they do not cover the cost of living. Yet as loyal employees, we have stayed on campus and still dream of a day when raises will be good.
As Southern Belle pointed out, the state plan is paid for by the state. Blue Cross merely administers it. There is no insurance company to negotiate with, and the plan must balance expenditures with premiums. The university pays the premiums for employees.
I know next to nothing about the business of health care except that it's pretty dirty and our health insurance is awful. If there is no insurance company to negotiate with then who do our premiums go to? Again, I know little to nothing about the business of health care but I do know that with as many employees that are represented by our plan it should be a bit better.
The state is "self insured" which means it pays claims from its own budget which comes from premiums. They plan to collect enough to pay the claims. If they run a deficit, they increase rates or reduce benefits or both. In recent years it has been both.