I thought you folks might be interested in the recommendations of a panel commissioned by the University of Texas concerning revamping their undergrad core curriculuum.

From the Austin American Statesman, 09/29/04--

"The University of Texas (presently) fails to equip its undergraduate students with a well-balanced body of basic knowledge in the arts, humanities, foreign languages, science, math and technology, according to a report released today."

"The Commission of 125 says every undergraduate student should:

--Receive exposure to culture, literature, foreign languages,humanities and arts,

--Explore math, science, and technology,

--Learn to think and read critically, write cogently, speak persuasively, and work alone and in groups,

--Engage in research and problem-solving,

--Examine ethics and leadership,

--Acquire a sense of history, global community, and respect for other cultures."

"The report recommends an overhaul of the university's core curriculum...to provide deeper training in such areas as writing, speaking, ethics, leadership, other cultures, and history.  It calls for fostering a disciplined culture of excellence, not only in undergraduate education, but also in graduate studies, research, and selection of academic program leaders."

Does this sound as though the UT panel is espousing the Shelby Thames academic model?

AE